Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Community Psychol. 2016 Aug 19;58(1-2):27–35. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12078

Table 3.

Adjusted effects of masculinity norms on sexual communication and sexual self-efficacy, by actor/partnerab

General sex communication
 Sexual risk communication
 Sexual self-efficacy
B SE p B SE p B SE p
Status, actor .006 .006 .309 −.006 .005 .227 .012 .003 <.001
Status, partner .005 .006 .408 .004 .006 .510 .001 .003 .870
Toughness, actor .001 .010 .905 .007 .009 .426 −.016 .006 .004
Toughness, partner −.016 .010 .112 −.005 .009 .589 −.005 .005 .326
Anti-femininity, actor −.030 .012 .009 −.032 .011 .002 −.016 .007 .016
Anti-femininity, partner .008 .011 .486 .011 .010 .239 .006 .005 .228
a

Covariates included in the model are gender, age, income, race, years of education, length of relationship with father/mother of baby, and relationship status with father/mother of baby at 6 months postpartum.

b

Bold values indicate significance, p < .05.