Table 2.

The efficacy of the program for people after stroke in the health authority (hospital) and community centre

	Health Authority (Hospital)	Community Centre
Efficacy^a	Data from third iteration (baseline n = 11) (mean change and 95%CI) TUG −2.6 s (− 6.7 to 1.5) p = 0.2 10 Meter walk (− 1.6 s) -4.3 to 1.1, p = 0.23 Berg Balance Scale 4.3 (0.9 to 8.5) p = 0.05 One participant stopped using mobility devices. Three did not require physiotherapy at end of FAME. Clients accessed physiotherapy service, albeit in a group format, an average of 31 days earlier than they were able to get in for 1:1 PT.	Changes in Short Physical Performance Battery (n = 16) 1.6 (− 0.8 to 4.0) p = 0.17 Two participants stopped using mobility devices.

Health Authority (Hospital)

Community Centre

Efficacy^a

Data from third iteration (baseline n = 11)

(mean change and 95%CI)

TUG −2.6 s (− 6.7 to 1.5) p = 0.2

10 Meter walk (− 1.6 s) -4.3 to 1.1, p = 0.23

Berg Balance Scale 4.3 (0.9 to 8.5) p = 0.05

One participant stopped using mobility devices. Three did not require physiotherapy at end of FAME.

Clients accessed physiotherapy service, albeit in a group format, an average of 31 days earlier than they were able to get in for 1:1 PT.

Changes in Short Physical Performance Battery (n = 16)

1.6 (− 0.8 to 4.0)

p = 0.17

Two participants stopped using mobility devices.

^aThere were four missing data points treated with imputation by last value carried forward