Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 30;48(1):5–20. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3987

Table 2.

Quality evaluation of prospective studies on psychosocial work factors and diabetes according to Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-intervention tool (ROBINS-I adapted) criteria. [DC=demand–control; ERI=effort–reward imbalance

Study Risk of bias due to confounding Bias in selection of participants into the study Bias in classification of exposure Risk of bias due to missing data Risk of bias in measurement of outcomes Highest risk of bias
Eriksson et al, 2013 (42) Serious Serious Moderate Moderate Low Serious
Garbarino et al, 2018 (34) Serious Moderate Serious Moderate Critical Critical
Gilbert-Ouimet et al, 2021 (13) Serious Serious Serious Low Low Serious
Heraclides et al, 2009 (38) Serious Serious Moderate Moderate Moderate Serious
Heraclides et al, 2012 (39) Serious Serious Moderate Serious Moderate Serious
Hino et al, 2016 (32) Moderate Critical Moderate Critical Critical Critical
Huth et al, 2014 (30) Moderate Serious Low Serious Moderate Serious
Kawakami et al, 1999 (44) Serious Moderate Serious Serious Moderate Serious
Kroenke et al, 2007 (12) Moderate Serious Low Serious Moderate Serious
Kumari et al, 2004 (36) Serious Serious DC (moderate); ERI: (serious) Moderate Moderate Serious
Mortensen et al, 2017 (29) - GAZEL Moderate Critical DC (low), social support (serious) Critical Serious Critical
Mortensen et al, 2017 (29) - SLOSH Moderate Critical DC (low), social support (serious) Critical Moderate Critical
Mortensen et al, 2017 (29) -Whitehall Moderate Serious DC (moderate), social support (serious) Serious Moderate Serious
Mutambudzi et al, 2016 (40) Critical Serious Serious Critical Serious Critical
Mutambudzi et al, 2018 (37) Moderate Serious Serious Critical Serious Critical
Norberg et al, 2007 (33) Serious Critical Low Moderate Low Critical
Nordentoft et al, 2020 (20) Moderate Serious Moderate Low Low Serious
Nyberg et al, 2014 (11) -COPSOQ-I Moderate Serious Serious Low Low Serious
Nyberg et al, 2014 (11) -COPSOQ-II Moderate Critical Serious Moderate Moderate Critical
Nyberg et al, 2014 (11) -DWECS Moderate Serious Serious Low Low Serious
Nyberg et al, 2014 (11) - FPS Moderate Serious Serious Low Moderate Serious
Nyberg et al, 2014 (11) - GAZEL Moderate Critical Low Serious Serious Critical
Nyberg et al, 2014 (11) -HeSSup Moderate Critical Low Serious Moderate Critical
Nyberg et al, 2014 (11) - IPAW Moderate Serious Serious Low Moderate Serious
Nyberg et al, 2014 (11) -PUMA Moderate Serious Serious Low Low Serious
Nyberg et al, 2014 (11) -SLOSH Moderate Critical Low Serious Moderate Critical
Nyberg et al, 2014 (11) - Still Working Moderate Serious Serious Low Low Serious
Nyberg et al, 2014 (11) -Whitehall II Moderate Serious Moderate Moderate Moderate Serious
Nyberg et al, 2014 (11) - WOLF N Moderate Moderate Low Low Moderate Moderate
Nyberg et al, 2014 (11) - WOLF S Moderate Moderate Low Low Moderate Moderate
Pan et al, 2017 (16) Moderate Serious Serious Moderate Moderate Serious
Smith et al, 2012 (31) Serious Moderate Serious Moderate Low Serious
Souza Santos et al, 2020 (19) Serious Critical Low Moderate Low Critical
Toker et al, 2012 (43) Serious Moderate Moderate Serious Moderate Serious
Yamaguchi et al, 2018 (41) Serious Serious Moderate Serious Critical Critical