Table 2:
Class | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Context | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Location | ||||
Home | 1.00 | .00 | 1.00 | .73 |
Friend’s home | .78 | .89 | 1.00 | .32 |
Party | .37 | .49 | .85 | .00 |
Relative’s home | .00 | .02 | .54 | .22 |
Car | .18 | .21 | .67 | .10 |
Cannabis Use Companions | ||||
Alone | .62 | .04 | .83 | .62 |
Romantic/sexual partner(s) | .52 | .23 | .82 | .44 |
Friend(s) | 1.00 | .97 | 1.00 | .20 |
Family | .16 | .11 | .79 | .33 |
Probably of cannabis use context by latent class at Wave 4. Proportions greater than .50 are bolded. Class 1 (alone and with friends) contained 127 individuals (46.2%); class 2 (with friends) contained 63 individuals (22.9%); class 3 (all contexts) contained 57 individuals (20.7%); and class 4 (at home) contained 28 individuals (10.2%). The first LCA was conducted with Wave 4 rather than Wave 3 because two of the three cannabis use variables of interest (motives and protective behavioral strategies) were not assessed at Wave 3. The LCA conducted on Wave 3 produced the same classes.