Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep;32(9):2147–2152. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021040480

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of KTRs explored according to the immunosuppressive regimen

Baseline Characteristics Group 1: Tacrolimus-Based IS Regimen, n=24 P Valuea Group 2: Belatacept-Based IS Regimen, n=10 P Valueb Group 3: Nontacrolimus- and Nonbelatacept-Based IS Regimen, n=11 P Valuec
Age, yr 60.2±17.4 0.21 68.1±13.7 0.82 66.6±15.5 0.29
Sex (M/W), n 12/12 0.59 6/4 0.51 5/6
Time from transplantation, yr 6.1±4.9 0.92 6.3±4.7 0.001 17.1±7.9 <0.001
eGFR, ml/min per 1.73 m2 45.6±13.7 0.005 30.4±11.6 0.007 50.1±17.4 0.41
Induction therapy for KT, n (%)
 ATG 11 (45.8) 0.16 2 (20) 0.21 5 (45.5)
 Anti–R-IL2 13 (54.2) 8 (80) 6 (54.5)
IS regimen, n (%)
 Tacrolimus 24 (100) <0.001 0 <0.001 0 <0.001
  C0 tacrolimus 6.1±1.8 0.007 0.54 <0.001
 Cyclosporin 0 0.78 0 0.69 8 (72.7) 0.05
  C0 cyclosporin 0.14 0.48 67.2±15.3 0.26
 MMF 23 (95.8) 0.12 6 (60) 0.60 8 (72.7) 0.56
 MMF median of dosage, mg 1000 <0.01 625 <0.001 1000 0.03
 AZA 1 (4.2) 0.13 2 (20) 0.12 1 (9.1) 0.77
 Everolimus 0 1 10) 2 (18.2)
 Belatacept 0 10 (100) 0
 Steroids 10 (41.7) 7 (70) 4 (36.4)

IS, immunosuppressive; M, men; W, women; KT, kidney transplantation; ATG, antithymoglobuline; R-IL2, IL-2 receptor; C0, through level; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; AZA, azathioprine.

a

Comparison between groups 1 and 2.

b

Comparison between groups 2 and 3.

c

Comparison between groups 1 and 3.