Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 18;1(1):237–246. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2017.1410431

Table 2.

Prevalence and location of chronic pain in total sample and by PSP category.a

  Total sample Municipal/provincial police1 RCMP2 Corrections workers3 Firefighters4 Paramedics5 Call center operators/dispatchers6 Chi-square Significant differences between PSP categories
Prevalence, % (n)                  
 Any chronic pain 40.2 (2035) 35.9 (482) 43.4 (563) 45.4 (318) 35.3 (284) 44.1 (297) 36.7 (91) 37.099*** 1 < 2, 3, 5
4 < 2, 3, 5
6 < 2, 3, 5
Chronic pain location, % (n)b,c                  
 Lower back 24.0 (1216) 22.1 (296) 26.5 (344) 26.1 (183) 18.4 (148) 28.9 (195) 20.2 (50) 33.845*** 1 < 2, 3, 5
4 < 1, 2, 3, 4
6 < 2, 5
 Shoulder 17.6 (890) 14.7 (197) 19.6 (254) 18.5 (130) 15.7 (126) 21.5 (145) 15.3 (38) 21.985*** 1 < 2, 3, 5
4 < 2, 5
6 < 5
 Neck 16.8 (849) 15.4 (207) 17.8 (231) 21.0 (147) 12.3 (99) 18.1 (122) 17.3 (43) 23.993*** 1 < 3
4 < 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
 Arm 11.1 (563) 10.6 (142) 12.5 (162) 12.6 (88) 6.7 (54) 12.5 (84) 13.3 (33) 22.561*** 4 < 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
 Leg 14.3 (726) 12.7 (171) 15.7 (204) 16.5 (116) 11.3 (91) 15.0 (101) 17.3 (43) 15.666** 1 < 2, 3
4 < 2, 3, 5, 6
 Hand 10.9 (554) 9.8 (131) 12.0 (156) 13.6 (95) 7.2 (58) 12.0 (81) 13.3 (33) 22.112*** 1 < 3
4 < 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
 Foot 12.6 (637) 11.8 (159) 14.9 (193) 15.4 (108) 7.6 (61) 12.2 (82) 13.7 (34) 30.671*** 1 < 2, 3
4 < 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
 Headaches 15.2 (769) 14.4 (193) 16.0 (207) 18.5 (130) 9.1 (73) 18.8 (127) 15.7 (39) 37.774*** 1 < 3, 5
4 < 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
 Other 7.1 (358) 5.7 (77) 8.8 (114) 6.8 (48) 5.2 (42) 9.1 (61) 6.5 (16) 17.900** 1 < 2, 5
4 < 2, 5

aPSP indicates public safety personnel; RCMP, Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

bNonmutually exclusive chronic pain locations.

cOnly calculated for respondents who reported experiencing any chronic pain, more days than not, that lasted longer than 3 months.

Different numbered superscripts indicate that public safety personnel categories differ from one another at 0.05 only. Differences across categories were tested using logistic regression models for prevalence.

*P ≤ .05; **P ≤ .01; ***P ≤ .001