Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 9;24(1):116–124. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab132

Table 2.

Comparison of Baseline Characteristics Between Matched SRS and Conservative Management Cohorts

SRS (n = 311) Conservative Management (n = 311) P Value
Age, mean yr (SD) 61.1 (12.9) 60.7 (11.7) 0.723a
Male, n (%) 72/311 (23.2) 63/311 (20.3) 0.381
Baseline KPS, median (IQR) 90 (90-100) 100 (90-100) <0.001
Diameter, mean mm (SD) 19.0 (9.3) 19.1 (8.9) 0.876
Volume, mean cm3 (SD) 3.8 (3.3) 3.9 (6.5) 0.804a
Laterality, n (%) 0.451
 Right 140/307 (45.6) 151/311 (48.6)
 Left 149/307 (48.5) 148/311 (47.6)
 Midline 18/307 (5.9) 12/311 (3.9)
Location, n (%) 0.798a
 Skull base 93/311 (29.9) 95/311 (30.6)
 Convexity 206/311 (66.2) 207/311 (66.6)
 Other 12/311 (3.9) 9/311 (2.9)
Margin dose, mean Gy (SD) 12.9 (1.8) –– ––
Maximum dose, mean Gy (SD) 26.0 (4.7) –– ––
Isocenters, median (IQR) 9 (6–15) –– ––
Treatment volume, mean cm3 (SD) 4.9 (4.1) –– ––
Imaging follow-up, mean mo (median; SD) 46.5 (36; 35.5) 46.6 (42; 28.3) 0.961a
Clinical follow-up, mean mo (median; SD) 47.4 (36; 36.1) 46.6 (42; 28.3) 0.767

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery.

aMatched covariates.

Bold values are those with P < 0.05.