Table 5.
Comparison of analysis time of doctors of different grades.
| Variables | Junior doctor | Intermediate doctor | Senior doctor | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tan score on sCTA (s), mean ± SDab | 94.43 ± 7.28 | 57.57 ± 7.89 | 20.43 ± 7.89 | 161.95 | <0.001 |
| Tan score on tMIP CTA (s), mean ± SDab | 75.43 ± 7.57 | 44.43 ± 8.06 | 20.00 ± 4.08 | 116.67 | <0.001 |
| sCTA VCCq (s), mean ± SDab | 142.29 ± 14.04 | 120.86 ± 14.06 | 115.71 ± 7.27 | 20.28 | <0.001 |
| tMIP CTA VCCq (s), mean ± SD | 110.43 ± 5.44 | 106.86 ± 6.27 | 101.71 ± 8.31 | 2.93 | 0.079 |
| CTP (s), mean ± SDab | 152.57 ± 12.22 | 130.43 ± 8.30 | 98.43 ± 8.54 | 53.44 | <0.001 |
a
, The P-value of LSD in Junior Doctor vs. Intermediate Doctor < 0.05.
b
, The P-value of LSD in Junior Doctor vs. Senior Doctor < 0.05.
LSD, least significant difference; tMIP CTA, time maximum intensity projection computed tomography angiography; sCTA, single-phase computed tomography angiography; tMIP CTA VCCq, quantitative measurement of vascular volume ratio on tMIP CTA; sCTA VCCq, quantitative measurement of vascular volume ratio on sCTA; CTP, computed tomography perfusion.