Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 1;27(1):213–223. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02033-4

Table 1.

Patient demographics and baseline clinical characteristics (safety analysis set, n = 16)

Safety analysis set (n = 16)
Disease type by investigator, n (%)
 DLBCL 14 (87.5)a
 PMBCL 1 (6.3)
 TFL 1 (6.3)
 HGBCL 0 (0.0)
Age
 Median (range), years 58 (44–70)
 ≥ 65 years, n (%) 5 (31.3)
Sex, n (%)
 Male 11 (68.8)
 Female 5 (31.3)
Body weight, median (range), kg 63.6 (44.6–78.2)
ECOG PS, n (%)
 0 12 (75.0)
 1 4 (25.0)
Disease stage at study entryb, n (%)
 I 4 (25.0)
 II 4 (25.0)
 III 1 (6.3)
 IV 7 (43.8)
Bulky disease (≥ 1 lesion of 10 cm in diameter), n (%)
 Yes 1 (6.3)
 No 15 (93.8)
Tumor burden (SPD) for target lesions, mm2
 Mean (SD) 4544.9 (6748.17)
 Median (range) 1991.5 (288–26,360)
International Prognostic Index, n (%)
 0 3 (18.8)
 1 4 (25.0)
 2 3 (18.8)
 3 4 (25.0)
 4 2 (12.5)
 5 0 (0.0)
CD19 positivity at baseline, n (%)
 Yes 13 (81.3)
 No 1 (6.3)
 Missing 2 (12.5)
 ≥ 3 lines of prior chemotherapy, n (%) 12 (75.0)
Refractory subgroup, n (%)
 Primary refractory 0 (0.0)
 Refractory to second- or subsequent-line therapy 10 (62.5)
 Relapse after ASCT 6 (37.5)

Baseline value is defined as the last value taken before conditioning chemotherapy

ASCT autologous stem cell transplantation, CD cluster of differentiation, DLBCL diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, HGBCL high-grade B-cell lymphoma, PMBCL primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, SD standard deviation, SPD sum of the products of the greatest diameters, TFL transformed follicular lymphoma

aOne patient was confirmed as having HGBCL by central read assessment

bCotswolds modification of the Ann Arbor staging system