Table 1.5.

Study types included in the review.

Study types	Number of papers	Reference	Author and Year
Interview-based qualitative evaluation	10	1	Judges et al. (2017)
		2	Wang et al. (2018)
		5	Czaja et al. (2018)
		6	Kadylak et al. (2018)
		10	Chen et al., 2016
		12	Coleman, Gibson, Hanson, Bobrowicz,& McKay (2010)
		17	Roberts et al. (2019)
		18	Hill, Betts, & Gardner, 2015
		2	Baecker et al. (2014)
		22	Karanasios, Cooper, Adrot, & Mercieca (2020)
Surveys of older adults' use of technology	4	11 14 16 23	Dennis et al., 2016,Sum et al., 2009 Lelkes (2013) Hunsaker, Hargittai, & Piper (2020)
Mixed-method evaluation	1	25	Fields et al., 2020
Quantitative evaluation	10	3	Ihm and Hsieh (2015)
		4	Czaja et al. (2018)
		7	Vošner, Bobek, Kokol & Krečič (2016)
		8	Vroman et al. (2015)
		9	Chai and Kalyal (2019)
		13	Pierewan, & Tampubolon, 2014
		15	Heo et al., 2011
		19	Kearns and Whitley (2019)
		21	Jaana & Pare (2020)
		24	Talmage et al. (2020)