Summary of findings 4. Population‐level impact of heated tobacco on cigarette smoking prevalence.
Population‐level impact of heated tobacco on cigarette smoking prevalence | |||
Patient or population: N/A Setting: Japan Intervention: introduction of heated tobacco to market Comparison: N/A | |||
Outcomes | Impact | № of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) |
Cigarette sales – assessed with national and regional sales data | 1 study found that the yearly percentage decline in cigarette sales accelerated after the introduction of heated tobacco in Japan, increasing from a mean decline of −3.10% across 2011–2015 to −16.38% across 2016–2019. A second study found similar results using a different method; it found that per capita cigarette sales were increasing at a rate of 0.10 to 0.14 (depending on statistical approach) per month before the introduction of heated tobacco in Japan. After the introduction, they declined at a rate of 0.63 to 0.66 cigarettes per month. | N/A (2 observational studies) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very lowa,b |
N/A: not applicable/available. | |||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. |
aDowngraded one level for indirectness: cigarette sales do not necessarily translate to reductions in smoking prevalence, as smokers may reduce the amount they smoke rather than stop smoking entirely. bDowngraded one level for risk of bias: one study was considered to be at serious risk of bias, while the other was deemed at moderate risk.