Lüdicke 2018.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: RCT Study dates: August 2013 to July 2014 Recruitment: clinical database and advertisements Location: Tokyo, Japan Setting: 5 days in clinic, and 85 days in an ambulatory setting |
|
Participants | Number randomised: 160 Characteristics: 42.5% women; mean age 37.2 years; 52.5% smoked 10–19 cigarettes per day, 47.5% smoked > 19 cigarettes per day; mean FTND score of 4.4 Specialist population: aged 22–65 years; Japanese; menthol cigarette smoker Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Randomised (2:1:1 ratio) to use an electronic HTP, continue smoking cigarettes, or become abstinent Heated tobacco arm Device heating method: electronic Device name: menthol THS 2.2, brand name IQOS Device manufacturer: PMI Other instructions and details: provided with menthol tobacco sticks Behavioural support: 5 days in a clinic setting, where product use was monitored. Record use of nicotine and tobacco products in electronic diary. Carbon monoxide breath tests were used to assess compliance Instructions for smoking cessation/switching: switch entirely to menthol THS 2.2 for study period Cigarette smoking arm Behavioural support: record use of nicotine and tobacco products in electronic diary Instructions for smoking cessation/switching: not advised to stop smoking Abstinence arm Behavioural support: record use of nicotine and tobacco products in electronic diary. Carbon monoxide breath tests used to assess compliance. Nicotine replacement therapy was allowed, but not provided Instructions for smoking cessation/switching: do not smoke cigarettes during study period |
|
Outcomes | Follow‐up time points: 4, 9, and 13 weeks Abstinence outcomes: N/A Safety outcomes: biomarkers of toxicant and carcinogen exposure; biomarkers of harm; adverse events; serious adverse events Prevalence/sales outcomes: N/A |
|
Notes |
Funding source Tobacco industry funded: quote: "The study was funded by Philip Morris Products S.A.". Author conflicts of interest Quote: "All authors are employees of Philip Morris Products S.A.". |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details on random sequence generation. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomised was performed using an interactive voice response system. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All outcomes were biological. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Low attrition reported across all groups, with 97% of participants who were randomised the heated tobacco, 98% to cigarette smoking, and 95% to abstinence arms completing the final follow‐up. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Did not report FVC outcomes, which were preregistered. |