Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 22;36(2):1563–1572. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08445-7

Table 2.

Statistical analysis comparing the task completion times and total distance between the fourth and fifth trials with a 4-month time gap between the two trials

Task 4th trial total time, mean (range) (sec) 5th trial total time, mean (range) (sec) P value 4th trial total distance, mean (range) (cm) 5th trial distance time, mean (range) (cm) P value 4th trial speed, mean (range) (cm/s) 5th trial speed, mean (range) (cm/s) P value
Tonsil 37 (26–48) 38 (25–55) 0.73 5.9 (2.9–8.9) 6.7 (2.2–9.6) 0.39 0.49 (0.29–0.81) 0.64 (0.17–0.97) 0.19
Epiglottis 45 (27–57) 33 (20–68) 0.05 7.0 (5.1–10.7) 7.5 (4.9–13.6) 0.75 0.30 (0.18–0.49) 0.66 (0.34–1.18) 0.007
Vocal Process 65 (53–80) 57 (38–95) 0.27 13.0 (9.2–16.5) 11.1 (7.2–16.8) 0.20 0.29 (0.19–0.45) 0.38 (0.30–0.51) 0.0007
Interarytenoid 60 (43–71) 45 (28–57) 0.002 11.1 (6.8–19.8) 9.75 (5.5–13) 0.37 0.27 (0.16–0.41) 0.36 (0.30–0.46) 0.02

The majority of the tasks did not show a statistically significant difference in efficiency of operating the FLEX™ System, and all the statistically significant results showed an improvement in task completion time and distance traveled