Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 6;19:2. doi: 10.1186/s12986-021-00632-6

Table 2.

Association of baseline hs-CRP and longitudinal hs-CRP changes with incident MetS (N = 4,116)

Models Cases / total (%) Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Hs-CRP quartiles at baseline
 Quartile 1 (< 0.48) 80/1,027 (13.85) 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 (Ref.)
 Quartile 2 (≥ 0.48 to < 0.81) 130/1,019 (12.43) 1.73 (1.29, 2.33) 1.73 (1.29, 2.33) 1.51 (1.12, 2.06)
 Quartile 3 (≥ 0.81 to < 1.63) 144/1,039 (12.35) 1.90 (1.43, 2.55) 1.91 (1.44, 2.56) 1.50 (1.11, 2.04)
 Quartile 4 (≥ 1.63) 181/1,031 (13.32) 2.52 (1.91, 3.35) 2.53 (1.92, 3.37) 1.83 (1.37, 2.47)
 P for trenda 535/4,116 (13.00) < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Log (hs-CRP) level
 Each 1 mg/L increase 535/4,116 (13.00) 1.39 (1.26, 1.55) 1.40 (1.27, 1.56) 1.23 (1.10, 1.38)
 levated hs-CRP b
 No 370/3,668 (10.09) 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 (Ref.)
 Yes 78/448 (17.41) 1.48 (1.13, 1.92) 1.50 (1.14, 1.94) 1.27 (0.95, 1.67)
Groups of absolute changes in hs-CRP during the follow–upc
 Group1 (≤ 0) 140/1,479 (9.47) 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 (Ref.)
 Group 2 (> 0 to ≤ 0.41) 77/873 (8.82) 1.33 (0.96, 1.82) 2.44 (1.84, 3.24) 3.24 (2.51, 4.02)
 Group 3 (> 0.41 to ≤ 1.21) 133/868 (15.32) 1.30 (0.93, 1.80) 2.41 (1.80, 3.24) 3.34 (2.56, 4.38)
 Group 4 (> 1.21) 185/896 (20.65) 1.31 (0.94, 1.82) 2.51 (1.87, 3.39) 3.34 (2.54, 4.40)
 P for trenda 535/4,116 (13.00) < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Groups of percent changes in hs-CRP during the follow–upd
 Group 1 (≤ 0) 140/1,479 (9.47) 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 (Ref.)
 Group 2 (> 0 to ≤ 60%) 113/870 (12.99) 1.98 (1.49, 2.64) 2.26 (1.69, 3.01) 3.29 (2.50, 4.37)
 Group 3 (> 60% to ≤ 181%) 120/871 (13.78) 1.87 (1.39, 2.52) 2.22 (1.65, 3.00) 3.71 (2.78, 4.99)
 Group 4 (> 181%) 162/996 (16.27) 1.91 (1.41, 2.58) 2.24 (1.65, 3.03) 3.76 (2.80, 5.09)
 P for trenda 535/4,116 (13.00) < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Model 1: Non-adjusted

Model 2: Adjusted for age (continuous, years), sex (male and female), education level (illiterate, primary school, middle school, and high school or above), and residence (urban and rural)

Model 3: Adjusted for the variables in Model 2 and cigarette smoking (never, former, and current), alcohol drinking (never, former, and current), BMI (continuous, kg/m2), hypertension (yes and no), dyslipidemia (yes and no), diabetes (yes and no), heart disease (yes and no) and stroke (yes and no)

Baseline hs-CRP (continuous, mg/L) was additionally adjusted for as a covariate in the analysis of quartiles of absolute changes (or percent changes) in SUA during the follow–up

CI, confidence interval; hs-CRP, high-sensitive C-reactive protein; MetS, metabolic syndrome; OR, odds ratio

aP values for trend were estimated by modelling serum hs-CRP using the median for each category

bElevated hs-CRP was categorized into two groups: yes (higher than 3 mg/L) and no (lower than 3 mg/L)

cParticipants were categorized into four groups: Group 1 included participants with negative or null changes, and Group 2–4 were tertiles for the remaining participants

dParticipants were categorized into four groups: Group 1 included participants with negative or null percent changes, and Group 2–4 were tertiles for the remaining participants