Table 6.

Comparison of genetic models between T2DM and NC

SNPs	Additive model				Dominant model				Recessive model
	P	OR (95% CI)	adP	adOR (95% CI)	P	OR (95% CI)	adP	adOR (95% CI)	P	OR (95% CI)	adP	adOR (95% CI)
rs4969168	0.044	0.84 (0.70–1.00)	0.008	0.77 (0.63–0.93)	0.062	0.79 (0.61–1.01)	0.016	0.70 (0.53–0.94)	0.171	2.00 (1.42–2.81)	0.064	0.71 (0.49–1.02)
rs2280148	< 0.01	0.65 (0.53–0.79)	< 0.01	0.61 (0.48–0.77)	< 0.01	0.61 (0.48–0.77)	< 0.01	0.56 (0.43–0.74)	0.023	0.40 (0.27–0.58)	0.048	0.51 (0.26–1.00)
rs10974914	0.007	1.25 (1.06–1.48)	0.014	1.26 (1.05–1.52)	0.316	1.13 (0.89–1.42)	0.501	1.09 (0.84–1.42)	< 0.01	1.74 (1.23–2.46)	< 0.01	2.13 (1.47–3.10)
rs10815157	< 0.01	0.73 (0.61–0.87)	0.018	0.79 (0.64–0.96)	0.151	0.83 (0.65–1.07)	0.482	0.90 (0.68–1.20)	< 0.01	0.87 (0.66–1.14)	< 0.01	0.46 (0.30–0.69)
rs1053005	0.311	1.10 (0.92–1.31)	0.119	1.18 (0.96–1.45)	0.375	0.96 (0.74–1.23)	0.865	0.98 (0.73–1.30)	0.002	0.80 (0.58–1.10)	0.002	1.91 (1.28–2.86)