Table 2.
Types of treatment | Weight of intestinal contents (g) | The volume of the intestinal contents (ml) | Reduction of weight of intestinal contents (%) | Reduction of volume of the intestinal contents (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
NC | 0.85 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.05 | ––––––– | ––––––– |
Loperamide 3 mg/kg | 0.26 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 69.41 | 75.00 |
Crude extract (mg/kg) | ||||
100 | 0.61 ± 0.03a2b3e3 | 0.50 ± 0.05a2b3e3 | 28.24 | 30.56 |
200 | 0.48 ± 0.04a3b2 | 0.37 ± 0.04a3b1 | 43.53 | 48.61 |
400 | 0.33 ± 0.03a3c3 | 0.21 ± 0.03a3c3 | 61.18 | 70.83 |
AF(mg/kg) | ||||
100 | 0.64 ± 0.02 a2b3e3 | 0.54 ± 0.02a2b3e2 | 24.71 | 25.00 |
200 | 0.50 ± 0.03a3b3 | 0.46 ± 0.03a3b3 | 41.18 | 36.11 |
400 | 0.35 ± 0.03a3c3 | 0.31 ± 0.03a3c2 | 58.82 | 56.94 |
CF(mg/kg) | ||||
100 | 0.67 ± 0.02 a1b3 | 0.57 ± 0.02 b3 | 21.18 | 20.83 |
200 | 0.66 ± 0.04a2b3 | 0.55 ± 0.04a2b3 | 22.35 | 23.61 |
400 | 0.53 ± 0.04a3 b3 | 0.42 ± 0.04a3b2 | 37.65 | 41.67 |
NHF(mg/kg) | ||||
100 | 0.81 ± 0.04 b3 | 0.69 ± 0.05 b3 | 4.71 | 4.17 |
200 | 0.79 ± 0.03 b3 | 0.68 ± 0.03 b3 | 7.06 | 5.56 |
400 | 0.67 ± 0.04 a1b3 | 0.53 ± 0.04a1 b3 | 21.18 | 20.83 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6); statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. acompared to negative control, bcompared to loperamide, ccompared to 100 mg/kg, dcompared to 200 mg/kg, ecompared to 400 mg/kg. 1p < 0.05, 2p < 0.01, 3p < 0.001. NC negative control