Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 20;33(Suppl 1):e214–e222. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002009

Table 1.

Demographic data, clinical presentation at time of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt creation and technical outcome

Refractory ascites Variceal bleeding
n = 213 % n = 88 % P value
 Male/female 129/84 60.6/39.4 63/25 71.1/28.4 0.09a
 Age mean ± SD; median (range) 58.9 ± 10.5 (24–84) 54.2 ± 13.1 (19–86) 0.001b
Etiology of liver cirrhosis 0.059a
 Alcohol 148 69.5 51 58.0
 Viral hepatits 37 17.3 16 18.2
 Others 28 13.1 21 23.9
History of clinical course
 Hepatorenal syndrome 75 35.2 12 13.6 <0.001c
 Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis 44 20.7 6 6.8 0.002c
 Hepatic encephalopathy 37 17.4 20 22.7 0.332b
 Endoscopic band ligation of varices 49 23.0 71 80.1 <0.001c
Clinical stage <0.001a
 Child-Pugh-A 2 0.9 14 15.9
 Child-Pugh-B 167 78.4 53 60.2
 Child-Pugh-C 44 20.7 21 23.9
MELD score
 ≤14 131 61.5 54 61.4 0.982a
 >14 82 38.5 34 38.6
Technical success
 Primary 207 97.2 87 98.9
 Secondary 5 2.3 1 1.1 0.675a
Mortality
 3d – periprocedural mortality 2 0.9 10 11.4 <0.001c
 30d – mortality 18 8.5 21 23.9 <0.001c
Major complications
 Bleeding from accidental laceration of segmental arteries 4 1.9 1 1.1
 Hemobilia from accidental laceration of segmental arteries 2 0.9
 Cardiac events 4 1.9 2 2.2
Pressure gradient
 PSG before before shunt creation 17.4 ± 5.5 18.7 ± 5.1 0.021b
 PSG after shunt creation 5.4 ± 2.7 5.9 ± 2.8 0.069b
 PSG reduction 12.1 ± 5.1 12.8 ± 4.8 0.112b

MELD, model of end-stage liver disease; PSG, portosystemic pressure gradient.

a

Chi-square test.

b

Mann–Whitney U test.

c

Fisher test.