Skip to main content
. 2021 May 26;13(23):26704–26711. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c02747

Table 1. Comparison of EFCs for the Self-Powered Detection of Glucosea.

anode cathode experimental conditions output signal sensitivity (μA mM–1 cm–2) linear range (mM) substrate reference
GOx/Os/hPG BOD/SB/hPG PB 0.1 M, pH 7.4 current 14.13 0.05–1 PCB this work
GOx/Os/hPG BOD/SB/hPG artificial saliva current 21.50 0.75–2 PCB this work
hPG Pt PB 0.1 M, pH 7.4 current 8.8 0.3–9 PCB (44)
GOx/chit activated carbon (air-breathing) n.d. current 0.02 1–5 paper (45)
GOx/TTF BOD PB 1 M, pH 7.0 power n.d. 1–25 paper (46)
GDH/NADH/Vit K3 BOD (air-breathing ) PB 0.1 M, pH 7.0 power 0.004 μW cm–2 mM–1 0.5–10 needle (47)
GOx/chit activated carbon artificial sweat current 1.35 μA mM–1 0.1–5.5 paper (48)
PQQ-GDH/Os BOD/CNF PBS 0.1 M, pH 7.4 power n.d. 0.1–1 SPE (49)
a

Legend: glucose oxidase (GOx), highly porous gold (hPG), chitosan (chit), tetrathiafulvalene (TTF), glucose dehydrogenase (GDH), reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), glucose dehydrogenase dependent on pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ-GDH), phosphate buffer (PB), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), printed circuit board (PCB), and screen-printed electrode (SPE). The sensitivity refers to the geometric area of the anode.