Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neural Eng. 2021 Nov 15;18(6):10.1088/1741-2552/ac3450. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac3450

Table 2. Change in selectivity with bi-electrode vs single-electrode stimulation.

Each entry indicates the fitted slope of the bi-electrode versus single electrode selectivity data from Fig. 3, with 90% confidence intervals on the slope obtained by resampling from the data with replacement 1000 times (see Methods). The last row indicates the aggregate results from all cells across all three retinas.

Selectivity measured by thresholds
mean (90% confidence interval)
bi-electrode vs single electrode (surrogate pairings) bi-electrode vs single electrode (real pairings)
retina 1 1.44 (1.37, 1.49) 1.39
retina 2 1.55 (1.44, 1.64) 1.40
retina 3 1.48 (1.40, 1.57) 1.55
pooled 1.47 (1.42, 1.51) 1.44