Table 4.
Items | Period | Treatment | p-value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
WPCS | WPCSW | CS | SCS | |||
Body weight (kg) | 0 d | 427.64±25.34 | 429.03±25.98 | 425.86±28.05 | 428.15±26.58 | 0.952 |
30 d | 469.41±23.33 | 464.19±25.68 | 456.69±29.41 | 461.99±26.37 | 0.148 | |
60 d | 496.12±22.36a | 489.49±26.33ab | 479.78±31.77b | 486.57±26.86ab | 0.040 | |
90 d | 509.41±24.45a | 501.75±26.73ab | 490.64±31.49b | 498.98±27.72ab | 0.016 | |
Dry matter intake (kg/d) | 0 to 30 d | 9.73±0.31ab | 10.07±0.24a | 9.50±0.32b | 9.54±0.21b | <0.001 |
31 to 60 d | 8.96±0.34 | 8.70±0.58 | 8.53±0.31 | 8.69±0.47 | 0.427 | |
61 to 90 d | 7.76±0.12a | 7.31±0.22b | 7.26±0.13b | 7.26±0.10b | <0.001 | |
0 to 90 d | 8.94±0.88 | 8.89±1.22 | 8.58±0.98 | 8.65±0.10 | 0.596 | |
Average daily gain (kg/d) | 0 to 30 d | 1.27±0.33a | 1.07±0.17b | 0.93±0.21c | 1.03±0.18bc | <0.001 |
31 to 60 d | 0.83±0.21 | 0.79±0.12 | 0.72±0.34 | 0.77±0.10 | 0.092 | |
61 to 90 d | 0.58±0.65 | 0.53±0.80 | 0.47±0.31 | 0.54±0.66 | 0.885 | |
0 to 90 d | 0.93±0.26a | 0.83±0.22b | 0.74±0.16c | 0.80±0.19b | <0.001 | |
Feed conversion ratio (F/G) | 0 to 30 d | 7.69±0.24c | 9.44±0.22b | 10.16±0.34a | 9.30±0.20b | <0.001 |
31 to 60 d | 10.73±0.40b | 11.01±0.74b | 11.83±0.43a | 11.31±0.61ab | 0.019 | |
61 to 90 d | 13.42±0.21c | 13.71±0.42b | 15.38±0.27a | 13.46±0.19bc | <0.001 | |
0 to 90 d | 10.20±2.47b | 11.11±1.87ab | 12.13±2.24a | 11.06±1.87ab | 0.039 | |
Gross profit (dollar)1) | 0 to 90 d | 1.81 | 1.72 | 1.44 | 1.69 | - |
WPCS, whole plant corn silage-based diet; WPCSW, mixed forages-based diet was formulated by substituting a portion of whole plant corn silage with wheat straw; SCS, sweet corn stalklage-based diet; CS, corn stalklage-based diet.
p-value for the main effect of treatment (type of diet).
The gross price of beef cattle was 3.82 dollars, Gross profit = income from weight gain – expense of feed.
Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p<0.05).