Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 3;7:23779608211055614. doi: 10.1177/23779608211055614

Table 2.

Comparison Between Egyptian and Saudi Students in Relation to Internet Addiction Test (IAT), Mobile Phone Involvement Questionnaire (MPIQ) and Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS).

Scale Egyptian students (N = 514) Saudi students (N = 253) Test P
No. % No. %
Internet Addiction Test (IAT) Average online user 198 38.52 86 33.99 X2 = 116.92 <0.001
Occasional or frequent problems 263 51.17 59 23.32
Significant problems 53 10.31 108 42.69
Mean ± SD Median (range) 55.91 ± 17.49 55 (20–118) 76.94 ± 26.27 74 (20–114) t = 11.54 <0.001
Mobile Phone Involvement Questionnaire (MPIQ) Not involved 36 7.00 44 17.11 X2 = 195.27 <0.001
Not highly involved 450 87.55 104 41.11
Highly involved 28 5.45 105 41.50
Mean ± SD Median (range) 28.28 ± 11.11 27 (8–56) 36.82 ± 13.62 36 (12–55) t = 8.65 <0.001
Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS) Higher normal daytime sleepiness 10 1.95 1 0.40 X2 = 39.08 <0.001
Mild excessive daytime sleepiness 33 6.42 0 0.0
Moderate excessive daytime sleepiness 128 24.90 108 42.69
Severe excessive daytime sleepiness 343 66.73 144 56.92
Mean ± SD Median (range) 17.47 ± 3.99 17 (8–35) 16.80 ± 3.83 17 (10–30) t = 2.27 0.024

IAT by (Young, 1998); MPIQ by (Walsh et al., 2010); ESS by (Johns, 1991); X2: Chi-square test; t: independent t-test; P: Probability; SD: Standard Deviation.

a

Participants who scored 5 or higher out of a possible 7 on the MPIQ were classified as being highly involved with their mobile phone, while participants who scored <3 were not involved with their mobile phone. (Choudhury et al., 2019).