Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 24;11:771045. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.771045

Table 2.

Network meta-analyses for OS.

Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab
0.62 (0.44, 0.88) Brivanib
0.70 (0.49, 1.00) 1.13 (0.90, 1.4) Donafenib
0.62 (0.43, 0.90) 1.00 (0.80, 1.25) 0.89 (0.7, 1.14) Erlotinib + Sorafenib
0.63 (0.44, 0.89) 1.02 (0.83, 1.24) 0.90 (0.72, 1.13) 1.01 (0.80, 1.27) Lenvatinib
0.55 (0.39, 0.79) 0.89 (0.73, 1.09) 0.79 (0.63, 1.00) 0.89 (0.70, 1.12) 0.88 (0.71, 1.08) Linifanib
0.68 (0.48, 0.98) 1.10 (0.88, 1.37) 0.98 (0.76, 1.25) 1.09 (0.85, 1.40) 1.08 (0.86, 1.36) 1.24 (0.98, 1.56) Nivolumab
0.37 (0.26, 0.54) 0.60 (0.48, 0.76) 0.54 (0.41, 0.69) 0.60 (0.46, 0.78) 0.59 (0.47, 0.75) 0.68 (0.53, 0.86) 0.55 (0.43, 0.71) Placebo
0.59 (0.37, 0.96) 0.95 (0.65, 1.41) 0.85 (0.56, 1.27) 0.95 (0.63, 1.42) 0.94 (0.63, 1.39) 1.07 (0.72, 1.59) 0.87 (0.58, 1.30) 1.58 (1.05, 2.38) Resminostat + Sorafenib
1.02 (0.67, 1.55) 1.64 (1.20, 2.23) 1.46 (1.05, 2.02) 1.63 (1.17, 2.27) 1.61 (1.18, 2.21) 1.84 (1.34, 2.53) 1.49 (1.07, 2.07) 2.77 (1.94, 3.78) 1.72 (1.09, 2.72) Sintilimab +Bevacizumab
0.58 (0.42, 0.80) 0.93 (0.82, 1.07) 0.83 (0.70, 0.99) 0.93 (0.78, 1.11) 0.92 (0.79, 1.07) 1.05 (0.90, 1.22) 0.85 (0.71, 1.01) 1.55 (1.29, 1.87) 0.98 (0.68, 1.41) 0.57 (0.43, 0.75) Sorafenib
0.55 (0.37, 0.82) 0.89 (0.68, 1.16) 0.79 (0.59, 1.05) 0.89 (0.66, 1.18) 0.88 (0.67, 1.15) 1.00 (0.76, 1.32) 0.81 (0.61, 1.08) 1.47 (1.10, 1.98) 0.93 (0.61, 1.43) 0.54 (0.38, 0.78) 0.95 (0.76, 1.20) Sorafenib +Doxorubicin
0.45 (0.32, 0.63) 0.72 (0.59, 0.87) 0.64 (0.51, 0.80) 0.72 (0.57, 0.90) 0.71 (0.58, 0.87) 0.81 (0.66, 0.99) 0.65 (0.52, 0.82) 1.19 (0.94, 1.50) 0.75 (0.51, 1.12) 0.44 (0.32, 0.60) 0.77 (0.67, 0.89) 0.81 (0.62, 1.06) Sunitinib
0.56 (0.35, 0.90) 0.91 (0.62, 1.32) 0.81 (0.54, 1.20) 0.90 (0.61, 1.34) 0.89 (0.61, 1.31) 1.02 (0.69, 1.50) 0.83 (0.56, 1.22) 1.50 (1.01, 2.24) 0.95 (0.57, 1.58) 0.55 (0.35, 0.87) 0.97 (0.68, 1.38) 1.02 (0.67, 1.56) 1.26 (0.86, 1.85) Tigatuzumab + Sorafenib

OS, overall survival.