Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 24;11:771045. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.771045

Table 3.

Network meta-analyses for PFS.

Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab
0.60 (0.45, 0.79) Brivanib
0.65 (0.48, 0.87) 1.09 (0.87, 1.36) Donafenib
0.52 (0.38, 0.70) 0.87 (0.69, 1.10) 0.80 (0.62, 1.03) Erlotinib + Sorafenib
0.57 (0.35, 0.95) 0.96 (0.60, 1.53) 0.88 (0.55, 1.42) 1.10 (0.68, 1.79) GEMOX + Sorafenib
0.89 (0.67, 1.19) 1.50 (1.22, 1.84) 1.38 (1.09, 1.74) 1.73 (1.36, 2.20) 1.56 (0.98, 2.49) Lenvatinib
0.78 (0.58, 1.04) 1.30 (1.05, 1.62) 1.20 (0.94, 1.53) 1.50 (1.16, 1.93) 1.36 (0.84, 2.18) 0.87 (0.69, 1.09) Linifanib
0.56 (0.42, 0.75) 0.94 (0.76, 1.17) 0.87 (0.68, 1.10) 1.08 (0.84, 1.39) 0.98 (0.61, 1.57) 0.63 (0.50, 0.78) 0.72 (0.57, 0.92) Placebo
1.05 (0.77, 1.45) 1.77 (1.37, 2.27) 1.63 (1.23, 2.14) 2.04 (1.53, 2.70) 1.84 (1.13, 3.00) 1.18 (0.91, 1.53) 1.36 (1.04, 1.78) 1.88 (1.44, 2.45) Sintilimab + Bevacizumab
0.59 (0.46, 0.75) 0.99 (0.86, 1.14) 0.91 (0.76, 1.09) 1.14 (0.94, 1.38) 1.03 (0.66, 1.61) 0.66 (0.57, 0.77) 0.76 (0.64, 0.90) 1.05 (0.89, 1.24) 0.56 (0.45, 0.69) Sorafenib
0.63 (0.46, 0.88) 1.06 (0.82, 1.38) 0.98 (0.74, 1.29) 1.23 (0.92, 1.64) 1.11 (0.68, 1.82) 0.71 (0.54, 0.92) 0.82 (0.62, 1.08) 1.13 (0.86, 1.49) 0.60 (0.45, 0.82) 1.08 (0.86, 1.34) Sorafenib + Doxorubicin
0.52 (0.40, 0.69) 0.88 (0.72, 1.06) 0.81 (0.64, 1.01) 1.01 (0.80, 1.27) 0.91 (0.57, 1.45) 0.58 (0.48, 0.72) 0.67 (0.54, 0.84) 0.93 (0.75, 1.15) 0.50 (0.39, 0.64) 0.88 (0.77, 1.01) 0.82 (0.64, 1.06) Sunitinib
0.54 (0.35, 0.83) 0.91 (0.62, 1.33) 0.84 (0.56, 1.24) 1.05 (0.70, 1.57) 0.95 (0.54, 1.67) 0.61 (0.41, 0.89) 0.70 (0.47, 1.04) 0.96 (0.65, 1.43) 0.51 (0.34, 0.78) 0.92 (0.64, 1.31) 0.85 (0.56, 1.30) 1.04 (0.71, 1.52) Tigatuzumab + Sorafenib

PFS, progression-free survival.