Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2021 Aug 5;17(1):514–520. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.06.022

Table 2.

The results of the linear mixed model analysis.

	Evaluation items
		Occlusal surface form	Margin design	Surface smoothness	Taper angle	Total cut volume	Overall impression
Haptics^a	B (95%CI)	0.367 (−0.103 to 0.836)	0.600 (0.057–1.143)	0.366 (−0.124 to 0.857)	0.300 (−0.213 to 0.813)	0.533 (0.082–0.984)	0.233 (−0.470 to 0.936)
Haptics^a	p-value	0.125	0.030	0.142	0.250	0.021	0.514
Evaluator 1^b	B (95%CI)	0.333 (−0.136 to 0.803)	0.233 (−0.309 to 0.776)	−0.400 (−0.890 to0.090)	0.433 (−0.080 to 0.946)	0.800 (0.348–1.252)	0.333 (−0.670 to 0.736)
Evaluator 1^b	p-value	0.163	0.397	0.109	0.098	0.001	0.936
Evaluator 2^b	B (95%CI)	−0.800 (−1.269 to 0.331)	−0.733 (−1.276 to −0.191)	−0.500 (−0.990 to −0.010)	−0.633 (−0.115 to −0.120)	−0.700 (−1.151 to −0.248)	−1.767 (−2.470 to −1.063)
Evaluator 2^b	p-value	0.001	0.008	0.046	0.016	0.003	0.000
Haptics x Evaluator 1^c	B (95%CI)	−0.900 (−1.563 to 0.236)	−0.567 (−1.334 to 0.201)	0.167 (−0.527 to 0.860)	−0.533 (−1.259 to 0.193)	−0.833 (−1.471 to −0.195)	−1.400 (−2.394 to −0.405)
Haptics x Evaluator 1^c	p-value	0.008	0.147	0.636	0.149	0.011	0.006
Haptics x Evaluator 2^c	B (95%CI)	0.667 (−0.597 to 0.730)	0.133 (−0.634 to 0.900)	0.100 (−0.593 to 0.793)	0.167 (−0.559 to 0.892)	0.167 (−0.471 to 0.805)	0.233 (−0.762 to 1.228)
Haptics x Evaluator 2^c	p-value	0.843	0.732	0.776	0.651	0.607	0.644

B: unstandardized partial regression coefficients.

^a

Reference: Conventional.

^b

Reference: Evaluator 3.

^c

Reference: Haptics x Evaluator 3, Conventional x Evaluator 1, Conventional x Evaluator 2, Conventional x Evaluator 3.