Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003828. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003828.pub3

Weale 1996.

Methods Trial: consecutive patients grouped according to surgeon's practice (usual referral practice) ‐ prospective cohort study
Participants 42 patients 
 22 posterior approach 
 20 direct lateral approach 
 Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK 
 Mean age 69.4y (post) 68.5y (lat) 
 68% female (post) 45% female (lat) 
 Follow‐up: all patients 4 weeks post surgery. 
 None lost to follow‐up
Interventions Implants used not stated 
 Rehabilitation procedure not stated
Outcomes ‐ Sciatic nerve injury 
 ‐ Obturator nerve injury 
 ‐ Femoral nerve injury 
 ‐ Operative time 
 ‐ Operative blood loss 
 ‐ Limb length discrepancy
Notes Quality score: Internal validity 5/10, descriptive criteria 4/5, statistical criteria 0/2, total 9/17 Pre‐operative diagnosis not well stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? High risk C ‐ Inadequate