Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 24;12:790848. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790848

TABLE 7.

Hierarchical regression results for belief pro-government fake news.

Variable B SE B β t R 2 R 2 adjusted ΔR2 AIC df
Model 1 0.011 0.005 0.011 956.172 274
Constant 3.518*** 0.287 12.253
Age –0.007 0.005 –0.081 –1.352
Gender –0.167 0.158 –0.064 –1.054
Model 2 0.112 0.101 0.101*** 932.3040 271
Constant 5.198*** 0.553 9.750
Age –0.001 0.005 –0.001 –0.070
Gender 0.050 0.160 0.019 0.312
Objective political knowledge −0.162*** 0.046 –0.229 –3.475
Scientific literacy –0.88 0.076 –0.071 –1.155
Political interest −0.182** 0.087 –0.137 –2.102
Model 3 0.361 0.347 0.249*** 843.5304 270
Constant 3.986*** 0.469 8.505
Age 0.001 0.004 0.004 0.093
Gender 0.013 0.136 0.005 0.097
Objective political knowledge −0.133*** 0.040 –0.189 –3.367
Scientific literacy –0.098 0.065 –0.080 –1.523
Political interest −0.133* 0.074 –0.010 –1.179
Satisfaction with government 0.276*** 0.027 0.502 10.232

Variable B SE B β t R 2 R 2 adjusted ΔR2 AIC df

Model 4 0.415 0.390 0.054*** 815.2916 259
Constant 2.367*** 0.647 3.657
Age –0.001 0.004 –0.010 –0.197
Gender –0.111 0.143 –0.042 –0.780
Objective political knowledge −0.076* 0.042 –0.106 –1.840
Scientific literacy –0.064 0.068 –0.051 –0.944
Political interest –0.121 0.074 –0.090 –1.637
Political orientation 0.155*** 0.046 0.281 3.394
RWA 0.079 0.093 0.067 0.400
System justification 0.166** 0.073 0.203 2.278
Conspiracy mentality 0.186*** 0.060 0.162 3.119
Need for closure 0.002 0.091 0.001 0.022
Social dominance orientation 0.038 0.065 0.034 0.582

AIC = Akaike information criterion.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.