Table 7.
Performance of the RF models on the two test sets when the cutoff is 20%
Data set | Model | SE | SP | ACC | AUC | MCC | F1-score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test set 1 (287) |
Model 1 | 0.370 | 0.869 | 0.742 | 0.736 | 0.264 | 0.824 |
Model 2 | 0.479 | 0.864 | 0.767 | 0.767 | 0.360 | 0.847 | |
Model 3 | 0.452 | 0.893 | 0.780 | 0.771 | 0.379 | 0.858 | |
Model 4 | 0.452 | 0.856 | 0.746 | 0.759 | 0.308 | 0.832 | |
Model 5 | 0.493 | 0.855 | 0.763 | 0.789 | 0.359 | 0.833 | |
Consensus model | 0.493 | 0.925 | 0.815 | 0.801 | 0.473 | 0.882 | |
Test set 2 (133) |
Model 1 | 0.8 | 0.891 | 0.887 | 0.973 | 0.384 | 0.938 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.859 | 0.865 | 0.978 | 0.432 | 0.924 | |
Model 3 | 0.8 | 0.883 | 0.880 | 0.939 | 0.371 | 0.933 | |
Model 4 | 1 | 0.914 | 0.917 | 0.955 | 0.534 | 0.955 | |
Model 5 | 1 | 0.898 | 0.902 | 0.973 | 0.499 | 0.946 | |
Consensus model | 1 | 0.906 | 0.910 | 0.981 | 0.516 | 0.951 |
Bold numbers refer to the maximum value (optimum value) obtained from the corresponding evaluation index