Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 21;12(4):433–438. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_803_20

Supplementary Table 2.

Intergroup and intragroup comparison of count, age, mean probing pocket depth, and mean clinical attachment level using analysis of variance with P value at a significance of 0.05

Sum of squares df Mean square F Significant
Count
 Between groups 12,380,164,074 2 6,190,082,037 2.357 0.104
 Within groups 149,674,263,552 57 2,625,864,273
 Total 162,054,427,626 59
Age
 Between groups 2905 2 1453 25.566 0.0005
 Within groups 3238.700 57 56.819
 Total 6143.933 59
Mean PPD
 Between groups 201.402 2 100.701 116.881 0.0005
 Within groups 49.109 57 0.862
 Total 250.511 59
Mean CAL
 Between groups 618.525 2 309.263 251.918 0.0005
 Within groups 69.975 57 1.228
 Total 688.500 59
P Highly significant at P≤0.01
P Not significant at P>0.05

Intergroup comparison of the bacterial count shows that it is statistically not significant. A large F value indicates a varied proportion of mean squares among the three groups. ANOVA: Analysis of variance; PPD: Probing pocket depth; CAL: Clinical attachment level