. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2021 Apr 8;10(4):422–433. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000341

Table 2.

Results of multilevel analyses examining if type of post predicts feedback received

	Self	Group	Others	No People	Overall Analysis
Likes	10.55^a	10.26^b	9.02^c	8.69^c	F(3, 2409)=119.54, p<.001
Other Comments	2.17^a	1.73^b	1.30^c	1.21^c	F(3, 2743)=111.26, p<.001
Poster Comments	1.27^a	0.89^b	0.58^c	0.60^c	F(3, 2762)=72.38, p<.001
PosAppear	2.41^a	1.94^b	1.27^c	1.23^c	F(3, 2233)=130.33, p<.001
NegAppear	1.02	1.02	1.01	1.00	F(3, 1838)=2.44, p=.063
PosNonAppear	2.25^a	2.41^b	2.38^{a, b}	2.23^{a, b}	F(3, 2235)=4.97, p=.002
NegNonAppear	1.07^a	1.09^{a, b}	1.07^{a, b}	1.12^b	F(3, 2232)=3.58, p=.013

Note. Marginal means are reported. Values in the same row that differ in subscripts significantly differed from each other at p<.05. Other Comments = Comments made by others. Poster Comments = Comments made by poster. PosAppear = Positive appearance commentary. NegAppear = Negative appearance commentary. PosNonAppear = Positive nonappearance commentary. NegNonAppear = Negative nonappearance commentary.