Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Womens Health Phys Therap. 2021 Oct-Dec;45(4):164–173. doi: 10.1097/jwh.0000000000000211

TABLE 5.

Number of participants with movement or positional impairments, urgency provoked with primary tests, and urgency relieved with secondary tests

Participants Displaying an Impairmenta Participants with Urgency Provoked with Primary Testb Participants with Urgency Relieved with Secondary Testc
Movement/Positional Test UFLUTSf
n=21
Cong
n=21
Ph UFLUTSf
n=21
Cong
n=21
Ph UFLUTSf
n=21
Forward bend 15 10 <.21 2 0 0.49 3
Return from forward bend 12 4 0.03 5 0 0.05 4
Single leg stancee 21 10 <.01 0 0 0.99 3
Sidelyinge 21 12 <.01 3 1 0.61 11
Participants Displaying a Positive Testd Participants with Urgency Provoked during Testb
Additional Clinical Testse UFLUTSf
n=21
Cong
n=21
Ph UFLUTSf
n=21
Cong
n=21
Ph
FADIR 7 4 0.48 8 1 0.02
FABER 3 2 0.99 3 1 0.61
Stork test 17 6 <.01
Pubic symphysis palpation 16 5 <.01
Hip ROM 17 12 0.18
External Rotation ROM 2 0 0.50
Internal Rotation ROM 5 0 <.01
a

Number of participants with any examiner-observed movement impairment in spine, pelvis or hip during primary test

b

Number of participants who reported same or worse bladder urgency during primary test compared to baseline

c

Number of participants who reported reduced bladder urgency with secondary test when compared to symptoms during the primary test

d

Number of participants with positive test (see Table 4)

e

Test performed bilaterally, participants only counted once regardless of if the phenomena occurred bilaterally

f

Participants with bothersome urgency and/or day/night frequency at least sometimes in the past 4 weeks

g

Participants without urgency and frequency symptoms

h

P≤ .05, values from Fisher’s exact test