Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 13;2015(8):CD010861. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010861.pub2

Summary of findings 7. Subcutaneous EPO with oral iron compared with oral iron (Comparison 10).

Subcutaneous EPO with oral iron compared with oral iron for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia
Patient or population: women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia
 Settings: obstetric care unit
 Intervention: subcutaneous EPO with oral iron
 Comparison: oral iron
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Oral iron Subcutaneous EPO with oral iron
Maternal mortality See comment See comment Not estimable 40
 (0) See comment No maternal deaths were reported.
Fatigue ‐ not reported See comment See comment Not estimable See comment Not reported.
Persistent anaemia symptoms ‐ not reported See comment See comment Not estimable See comment Not reported.
Thromboembolic events ‐ not reported See comment See comment Not estimable See comment Not reported.
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.