Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 13;2015(8):CD010861. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010861.pub2

Comparison 6. Intravenous iron and oral iron versus oral iron.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Persistent anaemia symptoms on a VAS scale: 1 week 1 72 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.75 [0.56, 5.46]
2 Persistent anaemia symptoms on a VAS scale: 2 week 1 72 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.6 [0.15, 2.33]
3 Persistent anaemia symptoms on a VAS scale: 6 week 1 72 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.0 [0.33, 27.50]
4 EPDS ‐ 1 week 1 72 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.0 [0.65, 13.88]
5 Length of hospital stay 1 72 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.30 [‐1.02, 0.42]
6 Adverse events (pooled) ‐ 1 week 1 72 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.67 [0.21, 2.16]
7 Adverse events (pooled) ‐ 2 weeks 1 72 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.29 [0.06, 1.28]
8 Adverse events (pooled) ‐ 6 weeks 1 72 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.4 [0.08, 1.93]
9 Red blood cell transfusion 2 112 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.15, 6.72]
10 Anaphylaxis or evidence of hypersensitivity 1 40 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]