Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 13;2015(8):CD010861. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010861.pub2

Comparison 9. Intravenous EPO, intravenous iron and oral iron versus intravenous iron and oral iron.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Leg paraesthesia 2 76 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.08, 6.65]
2 Red blood cell transfusion 2 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]