Table 3.
The main and/or interactive effects (ANOVA/MANOVA) of cadmium (Cd) and chokeberry extract (ChE) on the enzymatic antioxidative barrier and the concentration of reduced glutathione (GSH) in the sublingual salivary gland of female rats1,2.
| Parameter | Duration (months) | 1 mg Cd/kg diet+ChE | 5 mg Cd/kg diet+ChE | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd main effect | ChE main effect | Cd+ChE main effect | Possible character of Cd-ChE interaction | Cd main effect | ChE main effect | Cd+ChE main effect | Possible character of Cd-ChE interaction | ||
| SOD | 3 | — | — | — | — | NS | NS | 5.064∗ | Additive action 0 = 0 + 0 |
| 10 | NS | 19.56‡ | 25.11‡ | Antagonistic action 0 vs. –453 + 0 0 vs. –45 |
NS | NS | 7.536∗ | Antagonistic action 0 vs. –14 + 0 0 vs. –14 |
|
|
| |||||||||
| CAT | 3 | 5.879∗ | NS | NS | No interaction | 6.620 | NS | NS | No interaction |
| 10 | — | — | — | — | 13.37† | 9.632† | 20.44‡ | Antagonistic action 0 vs. –63 + 0 0 vs. –63 |
|
|
| |||||||||
| GPx | 3 | 6.472∗ | NS | 8.625† | Antagonistic action 0 vs. –52 + 0 0 vs. –52 |
NS | NS | 6.218∗ | Antagonistic action 0 vs. –42 + 0 0 vs. –42 |
| 10 | NS | NS | 6.704∗ | Antagonistic action 0 vs. –38 + 0 0 vs. –38 |
4.003∗ | 6.347† | 22.72‡ | Antagonistic action 0 vs. –59 + 0 0 vs. –59 |
|
|
| |||||||||
| GSH | 3 | — | — | — | — | NS | 5.199∗ | NS | No interaction |
| 10 | NS | 5.665∗ | NS | No interaction | 8.276† | NS | NS | No interaction | |
1The results are presented as F values and the level of statistical significance (p). F values having p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant (∗p < 0.05, †p < 0.01, and ‡p < 0.001). NS—p > 0.05.2To estimate the possible character of Cd-ChE interaction, the effect noted at coadministration of cadmium and ChE was compared to the sum of the effects of cadmium and ChE action after their separate administration (Cd+ChE versus Cd effect+ChE effect). 3The values are percentage changes. GPx: glutathione peroxidase; SOD: superoxide dismutase; CAT: catalase.