Table 5.
Quantitative comparison of TB detection methods. Accuracy, sensitivity, and area under curve (AUC) are reported for comparison. SGD is the abbreviation for stochastic gradient descent, ReLu for rectified linear unit, lr for learning rate, and AF for activation function
| Method | Optimizer | AF | LR scheduling | Images size | Pre-processing step | Dataset | Technique | Accuracy | Sensitivity | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAD [168] | – | – | – | 932 932 | Lung field segmentation using ASM | Private | ASM, Gaussian derivative filter, kNN algorithm | – | 86.0 | 82.0 |
| CAD [74] | – | – | – | 2048 2048, 1023 1005 | Lung field segmentation using intensity, lung model and Log Gabor masks | JSRT, MC | lung model, intensity and LoG mask, SVM, leave-one out evaluation | 75.0 | – | 83.12 |
| CAD [75] | – | – | – | 2048 2048 | Lung field segmentation using graph cut method | JSRT, MC, Shenzhen | Graph cut segmentation, ODI, CBIR, SVM | 84.0 | – | 90.0 |
| DL [65] | SGD | ReLu, Softmax | lr = 0.01 and it is decreased by a factor of 2 for every 30 epochs | 520 520 | Images resizing and data augmentation | MC, Shenzhen | AlexNet, transfer learning, dataset augmentation, threefold cross-validation | 90.3 | – | 96.4 |
| DL [88] | SGD | – | Training from scratch, lr = 0.01, pre-trained network, lr = 0.001 | 256 256 | Data augmentation and histogram equalization | MC, Shenzhen | GoogLeNet, AlexNet, transfer learning, data augmentation | – | – | 99.0 |
| DL [59] | Adam | ReLu, Softmax | lr = 0.0001 | 224 224 | No pre-processing is performed | MC, Shenzhen | CNN | 94.73 | – | – |
| DL [49] | Nesterov ADAM | ReLu | lr = 0.001 and decreased by factor of 10 when validation loss stops improving | 224 224 | Image resizing, normalization, and data augmentation | MC, Shenzhen, CXR-14 | DenseNet121, transfer learning, meta data | – | – | 93.7 |
| DL [128] | Adam | ReLu, Softmax | lr = 0.001 | 512 512 | Image cropping, resizing, and normalization | MC, Shenzhen | CNN, grad-CAM, cross-validation | 86.2 | – | 92.5 |
| DL [134] | SGD | ReLu, Softmax | lr = 0.001 | 224 224 | Image normalization using Z-score, lung segmentation and data augmentation | MC, Shenzhen | ResNet18, ResNet-101, VGG-19, InceptionV3, UNet, transfer learning, score-CAM | 98.6 | 98.56 | – |
| DL [114] | SGD | ReLu | lr = 0.01 with rate decay of 0.5 | 224 224 | Unsharp Masking, High-Frequency Emphasis Filtering, and Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization, cropping, image normalization | Shenzhen | ResNet-18, ResNet-50, EfficientNet-B4, UM, HEF, CLAHE, transfer learning | 89.92 | – | 94.8 |
| DL [11] | – | ReLu | – | 300 300, 229 229 | Image normalization and resizing | MC, Shenzhen | Inception-v3, MobileNet, ResNet50, Gabor filter, cross-validation | 97.59 | – | 99.0 |
| DL [39] | – | ReLu, Softmax | – | 224 224, 320 320 | Image resizing and data augmentation | MC, Shenzhen, COVID-19 | Transformer model, EfficientNetB0, EfficientNetB1, transfer learning | 97.72 | – | 100 |
| DL [119] | – | – | – | 512 512 | Image resizing, normalization, and data augmentation | MC, Shenzhen, Private | ResNext, UNet | 91.0 | 85.7 | 91.0 |