Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Sep 15;15(1):75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.07.021

TABLE 2.

Diagnostic Performance of Coronary CTA and CT-MPI

Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Accuracy TP TN FP FN
Per vessel
 Coronary CTA stenosis of ≥50% 96 (91–100) 72 (66–78) 54 (46–63) 98 (96–100) 78 (73–83) 71 155 60 3
 Coronary CTA stenosis of ≥70% 45 (33–56) 94 (91–98) 73 (60–87) 83 (78–88) 82 (77–86) 33 203 12 41
 Coronary CTA plus CT-MPI 84a,b (75–92) 89a,b (85–93) 73a (63–83) 94a,b (91–97) 88a,b (84–92) 62 192 23 12
Per patient
 Coronary CTA stenosis of ≥50% 94 (88–100) 53 (39–66) 65 (55–76) 91 (81–100) 73 (65–81) 51 30 27 3
 Coronary CTA stenosis of ≥70% 57 (44–71) 89 (81–98) 84 (71–96) 69 (58–80) 74 (66–82) 31 51 6 23
 Coronary CTA plus CT-MPI 89b (80–98) 79a (68–90) 80a (70–90) 88b (79–97) 84a (77–91) 48 45 12 6

Values are % (95% CI) or n. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of coronary CTA stenosis of ≥50% and ≥70% were compared to coronary CTA plus CT-MPI using the McNemar test and PPV and NPV using the weighted generalized score statistic.

a

P < 0.05 for coronary CTA stenosis ≥50%.

b

P < 0.05 for coronary CTA stenosis of ≥70%.

FN = false negative; FP = false positive; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value; TN = true negative; TP = true positive; other abbreviations as in Table 1.