Table 1.
Comparison of the performances of different electrochemical sensors for p-nitrophenol.
| Electrode material | Linear range (μM) | Correlation coefficient | Detection limit (μM) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aAuNP/RGO | 0.05–2 | – | 0.01 | 18 |
| Bi2O3NPs/CNT | 1–10 | – | 0.1 | 22 |
| bMWNT-Nafion/GCE | 0.1–10 | 0.998 | 0.04 | 23 |
| alpha-MnO2/MWCNTs | 30–475 | – | 0.186 | 24 |
| Nano-gold/GCE | 10–1000 | – | 8 | 25 |
| Nanostructured CeO2 doped Ag | 7.8–1000 | – | – | 28 |
| GO/GCE | 0.1–120 | 0.997 | 0.02 | 30 |
| cPd NFs/C60-NH2 | 5–1000 | – | 0.09 | 33 |
| Nanoporous gold | 3.59–71.8 | 0.994 | – | 64 |
| GN:ZnO NC/GCE | 0.099–21.8 | 0.996 | 0.0088 | This work |
aGold nanoparticle/reduced graphene oxide, bMulti-wall carbon nanotubes, cPalladium nano-flowers supported on fullerene.