Skip to main content
. 2021 May 18;61(1):24–41. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab452

Table 5.

Associations between neuroimaging biomarkers, cognitive dysfunction and APS or persistent aPL+

Author and year Sample (n) Cognitive domain(s) affected Statistical analysis Cognitive dysfunction (exposure) and imaging biomarkers (outcome) Imaging biomarkers (exposure) and aPL+ (outcome) Cognitive dysfunction (exposure) and aPL+ (outcome)
Structural MRI (n = 16)
Arvanitakis et al. (2019) [20] 956 No specific domains reported Linear regression, logistic regression Association not assessed Presence of brain infarcts and aPL+ (OR = 1.007, P = 0.97) Global cognitive function and aPL+ (beta = −0.062, P = 0.203)
Homayoon et al. (2014) [21] 1895 No specific domains reported Linear regression Association not assessed Hippocampal volume and aCL (IgG) (beta =0.071, CI 0.013, 0.007, P = 0.003) Global cognition and; aCL status (beta =0.361, CI 0.666, 0.058, P = 0.020); aCL (IgG) (beta =0.591, CI 1.058, 0.124, P = 0.01)
Erkan et al. (2010) [23] 143 No specific domains reported χ 2 statistic (Fisher’s exact test) Association not assessed WM changes and high titer aCL (RR 2.03, CI 1.04, 3.94, P = 0.02) Cognitive dysfunction and high titer aCL (P = 0.12)
Tektonidou et al. (2006) [31] 60 (cases), 60 (controls) Complex attention and verbal fluency Logistic regression Cognitive deficits and; WMLs (OR 4.18, CI 1.33, 13.11, P = 0.01); infarcts (OR 1.22, CI 0.35, 4.20, P = 0.76) Association not assessed Cognitive deficits and; aCL (IgG) (OR 1.92, CI 0.34, 10.78, P = 0.46); aCL (IgM) (OR 0.63, CI 0.22, 1.78, P = 0.38); LA (OR 2.38, CI 0.76, 7.40, P = 0.14); anti-β2GPI (OR 2.11, CI 0.74, 6.05, P = 0.16)
Kozora et al. (2014) [32] 20 (SLE), 20 (aPL+) Highest frequency of impairment in visual learning and memory, visuomotor speed and flexibility, verbal fluency, visuoconstruction and rapid auditory information processing Spearman’s correlation Cognitive impairment and abnormal/incidental MRI findings (P = 0.75) Association not assessed Cognitive impairment and aPL+ (P > 0.232)
Appenzeller et al. (2007) [34] 75 (cases), 44 (controls) General memory t-statistic [SPM(t)] Severe cognitive dysfunction and reduced WM and GM (statistical result not reported) Reduced WM and GM and aPL+ (statistical result not reported) Association not assessed
Appenzeller et al. (2005) [40] 115 (cases), 44 (controls) No specific domains significant Linear regression Cognitive dysfunction and reduced corpus callosum and cerebral volumes (P = 0.001) Cerebral and corpus callosum volumes and aPL+ (P = 0.1) Association not assessed
Tomietto et al. (2007) [35] 52 (SLE), 20 (RA) Memory, complex attention and executive function Logistic regression Severity of cognitive deficits and MRI severity (cerebral atrophy and ischaemic lesions) (OR 33.5, CI 3.23–348.3, P < 0.01) MRI severity (cerebral atrophy and ischaemic lesions) (OR 7.9, CI 1.5, 4.1, P = 0.01); macro-ischaemic lesions (OR 8.8 CI 1, 76, P = 0.03); and aPL+ Severity of cognitive deficits (OR 4.9, CI 1.2, 20.3, P = 0.03); executive function (OR 9.4, CI 1.1, 80, P = 0.02); complex attention (OR 6.22, CI 1.5, 25.6, P = 0.009); and aPL+
Whitelaw et al. (1999) [25] 69 Intelligence, visual reproduction, learning, executive function, auditory verbal learning Pearson’s correlation, Association not assessed VBRs and aPL+ (r =1.01, P = 0.0004) Intelligence (r = 0.72, P = 0.0007); visual reproduction (r =0.63, P = 0.003); learning (easy) (r =0.71, P = 0.0009); executive function (r =0.32, P = 0.05); auditory verbal learning (r =0.69, P = 0.001); and aPL+
Sarbu et al. (2015) [26] 108 No specific domains reported χ 2 statistic (Fisher’s exact test) Cognitive dysfunction and WMH (P = 0.045) WMH (P = 0.018); microbleeds (P = 0.002); cortical atrophy (P = 0.008); and LA Association not assessed
Steup-Beekman et al. (2013) [37] 155 No specific domains reported Descriptive statistics Association not assessed Association not assessed Association not assessed
Abda et al. (2013) [28] 34 Attention, memory, problem solving, visual-spatial processing, psychomotor speed χ 2 statistic (Fisher’s exact test) No statistical differences cognitive deficits and MRI abnormalities Association not assessed Association not assessed
Zirkzee et al. (2012) [29] 71 No specific domains reported χ 2 statistic Association not assessed Association not assessed Association not assessed
Emmer et al. (2008) [37] 52 No specific domains reported Linear regression Cognitive dysfunction and; lower MTR histogram peak for brain parenchyma (beta =0.435, R = 0.664, P < 0.001); WM (beta =0.445, R = 0.647, P < 0.001); GM (beta =0.306, R = 0.663, P < 0.01) aCL on MTR histogram parameters (ns) Association not assessed
Cho et al. (2007) [38] 25 (NPSLE), 18 (NBD) No specific domains reported χ 2 statistic Association not assessed Association not assessed n = 3 patients with cognitive dysfunction were aPL+ (association not assessed)
Roldan et al. (2006) [39] 28 (SLE), 28 (controls) No specific domains reported Fisher’s exact test Association not assessed Old cerebral infarcts and aPL+ and aCL (P < 0.001) Association not assessed
fMRI (n = 1)
Kozora et al. (2016) [22] 40 (cases), 10 (controls) Executive function, working memory Wilcoxon rank-sum test Higher activation in bilateral frontal, temporal and parietal cortices during working memory and executive function tasks (P < 0.001) Higher activation in bilateral frontal, temporal and parietal cortices and aPL+ (P < 0.001) Higher activation in bilateral frontal, temporal and parietal cortices during working memory and executive function tasks for aPL+ (P < 0.001)
TCD (n = 2)
Zamproni et al. (2013) [22] 27 Global cognition and executive function Mann–Whitney U test Worse global cognition and executive function with sRLS (P < 0.05) Association not assessed Association not assessed
Cantú-Brito et al. (2010) [30] 109 Memory, attention, visuospatial construction χ 2 statistic, logistic regression Cognitive dysfunction and MES (P = 0.036), cognitive dysfunction and MES (beta = 0.61, P = 0.19) MES and aCL (IgG) (ns) Association not assessed
EEG and CT (n = 1)
Chapman et al. (2002) [24] 23 No specific domains reported Fisher’s exact test Association not assessed Association not assessed Association not assessed
OCT (n = 1)
Shulman et al. (2017) [36] 21 (cases), 11 (controls) No specific domains significant Pearson correlation RNFL thickness and global cognition (r = −0.17, P = 0.45); memory (r = 0.08, P = 0.70); executive function (r = −0.25, P = 0.26); attention (r = 0.14, P = 0.53); information processing speed (r = −0.18, P = 0.46); visual spatial (r = −0.26, P = 0.26); verbal function (r = 0.19, P = 0.42); motor skills (r = −0.28, P = 0.21) Association not assessed Association not assessed

Anti-β2GPI: anti-β2 glycoprotein-I antibody; beta: coefficient for a multiple linear regression; EEG: electroencephalogram; fMRI: functional MRI; GM: grey matter; MES: micro-embolic signals; MTR: magnetization transfer ratio; NBD: neuroBehçet’s disease; ns: not statistically significant; OCT: optical coherence tomography; OR: odds ratio; P: statistical significance probability; R: correlation between predicted and observed values; RNFL: retinal nerve fiber layer; RR: relative risk ratio; r: Pearson’s correlation; SPM: statistical parametric mapping; sRLS: significant right to left shunt; TCD: transcranial Doppler; VBR: ventriculo brain ratios; WM: white matter; WMH: white matter hyperintensities; WML: white matter lesions. Bold text indicates results statistically significant.