Clarke 2011.
Methods | Randomized controlled trial Phase II, multicenter |
|
Participants | Incurable locally advanced or metastatic CRC, progressive disease after one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease and/or after prior adjuvant therapy, provided that relapse had occurred within 6 months of that treatment | |
Interventions | IRI + 5‐FU/LV vs IRI | |
Outcomes | Overall survival Progression‐free survival Toxicity |
|
Notes | Trial was terminated due to slow recruitment. Similar efficacy between the two arms but IRI + 5‐FU/LV had slightly less toxicities |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Minimisation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Central randomization/allocation by telephone |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No mention of blinding of participants and personnel |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No mention of blinding of outcome assessment |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Four patients withdrew early (2 in the intervention and 2 in the control arm). Three withdrew before baseline tumour assessment and did not receive any treatment. The fourth one opted 3 days after consent to receive off‐study irinotecan and cetuximab. These patients were included in the analysis, except one who explicitly refused. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No reported pre‐specified outcomes |
Other bias | Low risk | None |