Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 10;20(3):395–404. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00711-y

Table 3.

Change in cost-effectiveness analysis value determinations when herd immunity effects are incorporated

All studies, n (%) Pneumococcal vaccine studies, n (%)
Number of studies reported ICERs with and without HI effectsa 16 (of 44 studies) 8 (of 16 studies)
Number of ICERs recalculated with/without herd immunity effectsb 48 (of 140 ICERs) 24 (of 48 ICERs)
 $/QALY 21 (44) 18 (75)
 $/DALY 27 (56) 6 (25)
Where herd immunity effects included
 Base case 25 (52) 7 (29)
 Sensitivity analysis 24 (50) 18 (75)
 Both 1 (2) 1 (4)
Change in ICER after adding herd immunity effects
 Increase 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Decrease 48 (100) 24 (100)
 No change 0 (0) 0 (0)
Including HI reduced the ICER enough to cross the following thresholdsc
$/DALY
 Cost-saving threshold 2 (7) 1 (17)
 1 × GDP threshold 10 (37) 0 (0)
 3 × GDP threshold 8 (30) 2 (33)
 Did not cross any threshold 11 (41) 3 (50)
$/QALY
 Cost-saving threshold 4 (19) 4 (22)
 1 × GDP threshold 6 (25) 6 (33)
 3 × GDP threshold 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Did not cross any threshold 17 (81) 13 (72)

ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, QALY quality-adjusted life-year, DALY disability-adjusted life-year, HI herd immunity, GDP gross domestic production

aICERs with and without HI effects were directly reported or allowed for recalculation of ICERs with available data

bRecalculated ICERs refer to a pair of ICERs from the same study, one that includes and the other without herd immunity effects

cNot mutually exclusive: including herd immunity may cause the ICER results to cross more than one threshold (e.g., ICER results changed from dominated to below 1 × GDP threshold, the results were counted in both 1 × GDP threshold and 3 × GDP threshold categories)