Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 24;50(6):1959–1969. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab079

Table 2.

Independent associations of individual socio-economic disadvantage (ISED) and neighbourhood socio-economic disadvantage (NSED) with lifestyle risk index

Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
beta (95% CI) P-trend beta (95% CI) P-trend beta (95% CI) P-trend beta (95% CI) P-value
ISED
 Q4 (most  disadvantaged) 0.58 (0.56–0.60) <0.001 0.66 (0.64–0.68) <0.001 0.64 (0.62–0.66) <0.001
 Q3 0.32 (0.30–0.35) 0.35 (0.33–0.38) 0.34 (0.32–0.36)
 Q2 0.25 (0.23–0.27) 0.28 (0.26–0.30) 0.27 (0.25–0.30)
 Q1 (least  disadvantaged) Ref ref ref
Random effect, estimate 0.018 (0.015–0.022)
ICC 0.015 (0.013–0.019)
NSED
 Q5 (most  disadvantaged) 0.32 (0.28–0.36) <0.001 0.18 (0.15–0.22) <0.001 0.17 (0.14–0.21) <0.001
 Q4 0.28 (0.24–0.33) 0.16 (0.12–0.20) 0.15 (0.11–0.18)
 Q3 0.20 (0.16–0.24) 0.10 (0.07–0.14) 0.09 (0.06–0.13)
 Q2 0.13 (0.09–0.17) 0.06 (0.02–0.09) 0.05 (0.02–0.08)
 Q1 (least  disadvantaged) Ref ref ref
Random effect, estimate 0.020 (0.016–0.024) 0.010 (0.0079–0.013) 0.009 (0.007–0.011) 0.008 (0.007–0.11)
ICC 0.016 (0.013–0.020) 0.0089 (0.0070–0.011) 0.0077 (0.0059–0.010) 0.0076 (0.0058–0.0099)
Interaction: ISED*NSED 0.016 (0.011–0.021) <0.001
*

Model 1: ISED or NSED; Model 2: ISED and NSED+ age+ sex; Model 3: Model 2+ body mass index (BMI); Model 4: Model 3+ ISED*NSED; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient.