Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 3;23(1):13–29. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0112

Table 2. Summary of Studies Assessing Hepatic Steatosis Using CAP.

Study N Probe Reference Standard Target Degree of Steatosis Optimal Cutoff (dB/m) AUROC Sen (%) Spe (%)
Sasso et al. [19] 115 M Biopsy ≥ S1 (10%) 238 0.91 91 81
≥ S2 259 0.95 89 86
≥ S3 292 0.89 100 78
de Lédinghen et al. [73] 112 M Biopsy ≥ S1 (10%) 266 0.84 69 85
≥ S2 311 0.86 57 94
≥ S3 318 0.93 87 91
Myers et al. [74] 153 M Biopsy ≥ 10% 283 0.81 76 79
≥ S1 (5%) 289 0.79 68 88
≥ S2 288 0.76 85 62
≥ S3 283 0.70 94 47
Masaki et al. [75] 155 M Biopsy ≥ S1 (5%) 233 0.88 87 77
Chan et al. [76] 161 M Biopsy ≥ S1 (5%) 263 0.97 92 94
≥ S2 263 0.86 97 68
≥ S3 281 0.75 100 53
Chon et al. [77] 135 M Biopsy ≥ S1 (5%) 250 0.89 73 95
≥ S2 299 0.89 82 86
≥ S3 327 0.80 78 84
Shen et al. [78] 152 M Biopsy ≥ S1 (5%) 253 0.92 89 83
≥ S2 285 0.92 93 83
≥ S3 310 0.88 92 79
Karlas et al. [79] 65 M Biopsy ≥ S1 (5%) 234 0.93 93 87
≥ S2 269 0.94 97 81
≥ S3 301 0.82 82 76
de Lédinghen et al. [80] 261 M Biopsy ≥ S2 310 0.80 79 71
≥ S3 311 0.66 87 47
Eddowes et al. [81] 380 M, XL Biopsy ≥ S1 (5%) 302 0.87 80 83
≥ S2 331 0.77 70 76
≥ S3 337 0.70 72 63
Oeda et al. [82] 122 M Biopsy ≥ S2 267 0.64 93 36
≥ S3 286 0.69 90 43
XL Biopsy ≥ S2 273 0.68 96 32
≥ S3 302 0.71 84 48
Caussy et al. [83] 100 M MRI-PDFF ≥ 5% 294 0.84 75 78
≥ 10% 311 0.89 79 85
XL MRI-PDFF ≥ 5% 307 0.86 74 75
≥ 10% 322 0.93 83 87

AUROC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, CAP = controlled attenuation parameter, PDFF = proton density fat fraction, Sen = sensitivity, Spe = specificity