Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 10;116:210–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.01.015

Table 2.

Study design for interventional studies compared with COVID-19 and others

Interventional Studies COVID-19 (n=3622) Others (n=37539) P value
Allocation: N/A 618(17.06%) 9988(26.61%) <0.001
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment 0(0.00%) 9(0.02%) 0.582
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment 0(0.00%) 8(0.02%) 0.619
Intervention Model: Sequential Assignment 10(0.28%) 317(0.84%) 0.030
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment 608(16.79%) 9654(25.72%) 0.019
Allocation: Non-Randomized 330(9.11%) 3545(9.44%) 0.513
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment 19(0.52%) 157(0.42%) 0.268
Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment 2(0.06%) 41(0.11%) 0.523
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment 224(6.18%) 2069(5.51%) 0.001
Intervention Model: Sequential Assignment 53(1.46%) 870(2.32%) 0.001
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment 32(0.88%) 408(1.09%) 0.321
Allocation: Randomized 2673(73.80%) 23970(63.85%) <0.001
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment 87(2.40%) 2494(6.64%) <0.001
Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment 47(1.30%) 388(1.03%) 0.589
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment 2381(65.74%) 20106(53.56%) <0.001
Intervention Model: Sequential Assignment 123(3.40%) 656(1.75%) <0.001
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment 35(0.97%) 326(0.87%) 0.830
Allocation: Unknown 1 (0.03%) 36(0.10%) 0.151