Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec;13(12):6994–7005. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1240

Table 2. Recent works of AI-assisted application in other surgery.

Study Year Operations No. of video Applications Performance
Matava et al. (24) 2020 Laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy 775 Anatomy classification in real-time Overall confidence of classification ranges 0.54 to 0.84
Kitaguchi et al. (26) 2020 Colorectal surgery 300 Surgical phase, action, and tool recognition Accuracy of 81.0%, 83.2%, and 51.2% respectively
Madad Zadeh et al. (27) 2020 Hysterectomy 461 images Anatomy detection Accuracy of 24–97%
Morita et al. (54) 2019 Cataract surgery 303 Surgical phase recognition Mean correct response rate of 96.5%
Bodenstedt et al. (55) 2019 Laparoscopic procedure 80 Surgical duration prediction Overall average error of 37%
Hashimoto et al. (56) 2019 Gastrectomy 88 Surgical phase recognition Accuracy of 82%
Korndorffer et al. (57) 2020 Cholecystectomy 1,051 CVS and intraoperative events evaluation Accuracy of 75%, and 99%
Mascagni et al. (59) 2020 Cholecystectomy 100 Formalization of video reporting of CVS Kappa scores of inter-rater agreements by binary assessment is 0.75
Yamazaki et al. 2020 Gastrectomy 52 Surgical tool detection Accuracy 86% accuracy

AI, artificial intelligence; CVS, critical view of safety.