Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec;10(12):4643–4665. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-557

Table 5. Use of AC in elderly patients.

Study Number of patients who underwent surgical resection; stage disease Number of patients received AC Period of recruitment AC use in elderly patients Chemotherapy regimen prescribed Dose modification or omission Survival analysis elderly patients
Booth et al., 2010, (47) 3,354; 43% older ≥70 years old; I–IV 1,224 Retrospective (2001 → 2006) 16% of patients >70 years old received AC Cisplatin or carboplatin-based regimen
Cuffe et al., 2012, (48) 6,304; 43.8% older ≥70 years old; I–IV 1,224 Retrospective (2001 → 2006) 70–74 years old: 191 patients received AC among 1,317 who underwent lung resection Cisplatin-based regimen (with vinorelbine or etoposide); carboplatin-based regimen (with vinorelbine or paclitaxel); other 584 chemotherapy data available:
75–79 years old: 81 patients received AC among 980 who underwent lung resection 584 chemotherapy data available: Cisplatin changed for carboplatin: 5% among 75–79 years old patients
≥80 years old: 13 patients received AC among 466 patients who underwent lung resection Cisplatin-based: 71%
(70–74 years old), 67%
(75–79 years old), 71%
(≥80 years old)
Dose reduction: 30% (70–74 years old), 32% (75–79 years old)
Carboplatin-based: 26%
(70–74 years old), 33%
(75–79 years old), 29%
(≥80 years old)
Dose omission: 21% (70–74 years old), 32% (75–79 years old), 25% (≥80 years old)
Ganti et al.,2015, (49) 7,593; 38% older ≥70 years old; IB–III 1,928 Retrospective (2001 → 2011) Percentage of older patients (i.e., ≥70 years old) who received AC: approximately one half of younger patients (15.3% vs. 31.6%; P<0.0001) Cisplatin or carboplatin-based regimen As for younger patients, AC significantly improved OS among patients ≥70 years old [adjusted HR (95% CI):
0.81 (0.71–0.92)]
Compared with younger patients, patients ≥70 years old received significantly more frequently carboplatin-based regimen (72% vs. 62.3%; P<0.0001)
Kankesan et al., 2013, (52) 3,354; 45% older ≥70 years old; I–IV 1,032 Retrospective (2004 → 2006) Patients older than 70 years old significantly less referred to medical oncologist (45% of patients; P<0.001)
Patients older than 70 years old significantly less treated with AC (35% of patients older than 70 years old referred to medical oncologist treated with AC; P<0.001)
Rajaram et al., 2016, (28) 112,049; 20% older ≥75 years old; IB–IIIA 31,709 Retrospective (2002 → 2011) Compared to patients younger than 55 years old, patients older than 56 years old have significantly less likelihood to receive AC [adjusted OR (95% CI); especially among patients >75 years old: 0.15 (0.12–0.18); P<0.001]
Berry et al., 2015, (50) 2,781 patients >65 years old; stage II 784 Retrospective (1992 → 2006) Patients aged 70–74, 75–79, 80–84 and ≥85 years old received significantly less AC Platinum-based regimen administered to 76% of patients 61% received four or more cycles (no information about dose reduction) AC remained an independent prognostic factor associated with survival among all patients aged ≥66 years old (P=0.0002)
Wisnivesky et al., 2011, (53) 3,324 patients >65 years old; IIA–IIIA 684 Retrospective (1992 → 2005) AC associated with improved OS for patients 70–79 years old [adjusted HR (95% CI): 0.82 (0.71–0.94)]
No survival benefit for patients older than 80 years old [adjusted HR (95% CI): 1.33 (0.86–2.06)]
Rodriguez et al., 2012, (33) 99; 30% ≥70 years old; IB, II and higher 53 Retrospective (2006 → 2011) Patients ≥70 years old received significantly less AC compared to youngers; (25% vs. 66.7%; P<0.01) Significantly less cycles of chemotherapy received for patients aged ≥70 years old (median number of cycles received 2 {range, [1–2]} compared to younger (median number of cycles received 4 {range, [2–4]}; P=0.04
Batum et al., 2018, (54) –; IA–IIIB 91 Retrospective (2012 → 2016) Platinum-based regimen with vinorelbine, pemetrexed, gemcitabine, etoposide, docetaxel No significant differences between number of cycles of AC received No significant differences between younger and older patients in terms of OS (P=0.119) and DFS (P=0.407)
>65 years old patients treated with: platinum + vinorelbine (70%); carboplatin-based regimen (5%) 90% of patients >65 years old completed four cycles of AC
No significant differences in chemotherapy regimen administered between younger and older patients
Zhai et al., 2016, (39) –; IB–IIIA 865 Retrospective (2001 → 2013) Platinum-based regimen with vinorelbine, pemetrexed, gemcitabine, docetaxel, paclitaxel No significant differences between number of cycles of AC received No significant differences in DFS between younger and older patients (P=0.328)
No significant differences in chemotherapy regimen received between younger (i.e., <65 years old) and older patients (i.e., ≥65 years old) 79.1% of patients ≥65 years old completed four cycles of AC
No significant differences in mean time to receive AC after surgery between younger and older patients
Park et al., 2013, (55) –; IB–IIIA 139 Retrospective (2008 → 2011) Chemotherapy regimen: cisplatin-vinorelbine or carboplatin-paclitaxel No significant differences in mean dose intensity and relative dose intensity between younger and older patients for both AC regimen No significant differences between aged groups (i.e., <65 years old and ≥65 years old) in terms of OS (P=0.4274) and relapse-free survival (P=0.4512)
Elderly patients (66 patients ≥65 years old) most frequently treated with carboplatin-paclitaxel (54.5%) and less frequently with cisplatin-vinorelbine (45.5%) although not significant 92.4% of elderly patients completed 4 cycles of AC
40.9% of elderly patients has a dose reduction, no significant difference compared to youngers
Lin et al., 2012, (51) 2,231; 764 patients ≥70 years old; IA–IIIA 428 Retrospective (2004 → 2007) Among patients ≥70 years old with stage II disease: 16% received AC Platinum-based regimen Among patients
>70 years old with stage II and IIIA disease: AC use associated with a significant improvement of OS compared to surgery alone
Among patients ≥70 years old with stage IIIA disease: 42% received AC

AC, adjuvant chemotherapy; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival.