Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 29;55(5):546–553. doi: 10.1159/000518075

Table 4.

Judgment of external validity

Criterion Routine data analysis Impact on external validity Oral health survey Impact on external validity
Representativity Sample representative for a small study population Negative Representative sample Positive

Sample representative for a large study population (e.g., nationwide insurance data) Negative to positive (depending on population characteristics) Nonrepresentative sample Negative

Response/selection Very high coverage rate, no selection Positive Low response rate Negative

High response rate Positive

Blinding (subjects) Health system data − no direct connection to subjects Positive Subjects are informed about study aim − healthy subjects possibly more attracted Negative

Statistical adjustments Adjustments possible (e.g., of age and gender) Positive Nonresponse analysis Positive

No nonresponse analysis Negative

Potential replication Replication easily possible Positive Possible, but more difficult Negative

Variable: caries experience of 12-year-olds. Routine data analysis versus oral health survey. No claim to completeness.