Table 4.
Judgment of external validity
| Criterion | Routine data analysis | Impact on external validity | Oral health survey | Impact on external validity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representativity | Sample representative for a small study population | Negative | Representative sample | Positive |
|
| ||||
| Sample representative for a large study population (e.g., nationwide insurance data) | Negative to positive (depending on population characteristics) | Nonrepresentative sample | Negative | |
|
| ||||
| Response/selection | Very high coverage rate, no selection | Positive | Low response rate | Negative |
|
| ||||
| High response rate | Positive | |||
|
| ||||
| Blinding (subjects) | Health system data − no direct connection to subjects | Positive | Subjects are informed about study aim − healthy subjects possibly more attracted | Negative |
|
| ||||
| Statistical adjustments | Adjustments possible (e.g., of age and gender) | Positive | Nonresponse analysis | Positive |
|
| ||||
| No nonresponse analysis | Negative | |||
|
| ||||
| Potential replication | Replication easily possible | Positive | Possible, but more difficult | Negative |
Variable: caries experience of 12-year-olds. Routine data analysis versus oral health survey. No claim to completeness.