Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 7;10(1):406–416. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.01.001

Table 2.

Translation of codes into themes.

Themes Subthemes Thematic codes (Frequency of the codes)
1. Perceived safety of different transport modes Transportation mode
  • -

    (no) Change in commute mode (20).

  • -

    Previous travel pattern: rickshaw for short distance, CNG for long distance travel (5).

  • -

    Stopped non-essential travel (9).

  • -

    Try to use (perceived) safe transport (7).

Health risk consciousness
  • -

    Remain conscious while traveling (8).

  • -

    Carry hygiene products while going outside of home (9).

Perceived risk
  • -

    Difference in perceived risk by transport mode (20).

  • -

    Higher risk is perceived in modes with confined spaces (13).

  • -

    Higher risk is perceived in modes that need to be shared with unknown people (18)

  • -

    Air-conditioned vehicles are perceived risky (4).

  • -

    Bus is perceived as the most risky (17).

  • -

    Motorized two-wheelers are perceived safe for individual use (8).

  • -

    Motorized two-wheeler based ride-hailing services are perceived unsafe (10).

Trust issue
  • -

    Can’t trust unknown parties regarding their hygiene practices (21).

  • -

    Lack of awareness on health guidelines/ hygiene practices among the public (24).

  • -

    Unreliability on transport operators regarding disinfecting the vehicle (13).

Crowd/ Physical distancing
  • -

    Impossible to maintain physical distancing in public transport (18).

  • -

    Sometimes, buses operator don’t follow health and government mandates on social distancing (9).

  • -

    Increased number of pedestrians and hawkers in roads (7).

  • -

    Change in office time table to avoid pedestrian crowd (2).

  • -

    No way to maintain physical distancing in motorized two-wheelers based ride-hailing services (8).

2. Preferences and dilemmas while using or switching to a different transport mode
Affordability, Increased fare
  • -

    Increase of bus fare (13).

  • -

    Can’t afford CNG fare (10).

  • -

    Job loss among the general public (4).

  • -

    Salary reduction (7).

  • -

    Increase in daily expenses (12).

  • -

    Spending on (perceived) safe transport seems luxury / unaffordable (10).

  • -

    Currently using (perceived) safer modes, but not sure how long they can afford (9).

  • -

    60 % increase in bus fare during post-lockdown (6).

(Un) Availability of transport modes
  • -

    Rickshaw is not allowed in the office route (4).

  • -

    Can’t ride in the bus due to disability (2).

  • -

    Commute route is accident prone for cyclists (4).

  • -

    No way to go to the job location by walking due to distance (13)

  • -

    Lack of proper infrastructure (14)

Aspire to use private transport
  • -

    Private modes are safer and convenient, but comparatively expensive (24).

Office transport
  • -

    (no) Office transport facility due to COVID-19 (9).

  • -

    Feel comparatively safe while traveling while using office transport (4)

  • -

    Provision of office transport has reduced the cost of transportation for some employees (9).

Reduced capacity
  • -

    50 % capacity in buses is allowed (11).

Informal transport
  • -

    Unavailability of app-based ride-hailing services during the post-lockdown (8).

  • -

    Motorized two-wheeler based informal ride-hailing services were available (13).

Interest in motorized two-wheelers
  • -

    Emphasis on the benefits of motorized two-wheelers (e.g., speed, convenience, parking) (6).

  • -

    Conscious about motorized two-wheelers related accidents (6).

  • -

    Safety features on motorized two wheelers (2).

  • -

    Expensive to purchase (9).

  • -

    Personal motorized two-wheelers can provide protection from getting infected (by the virus) while traveling (5).

License
  • -

    Licensing and training to ride (7).

  • -

    High vehicle registration cost (7).

Increase in walking
  • -

    Started walking for longer distance (commute or non-commute) compared to the pre-pandemic situation (7).

  • -

    If distance can be covered through walking, prefer walk rather than using shared modes of transport (5).

  • -

    Pedestrian crowd in side-walks (5).

  • -

    Lack of proper pedestrian facilities (11).

Bicycle as a commute mode
  • -

    Bicycle is environment friendly but not suitable for Dhaka’s road (13).

  • -

    Bicycle is not convenient considering Dhaka’s weather (e.g., hot, humidity, rain) (15).

  • -

    Bicyle can be used for short distance travel (5).

  • -

    Gender differences in cycling because of the cultural acceptance (3).

  • -

    Number of female motorized two-wheeler and bicycle users are very low in Bangladesh (3).

Bicycle storage
  • -

    Lack of shower facility (7).

  • -

    No bicycle parking on streets (4).

  • -

    No bicycle storage at workplaces (7).

  • -

    Bicycle got stolen (2).

Unsafe bicycle infrastructure
  • -

    Need bicycle infrastructure (e.g., lane, interconnected network) to use them (11).

  • -

    Bicycle is perceived as safe from the disease perspective, but not safe from the traffic accident perspective (4).

Note: The total number of times the thematic codes arise from the interviews are noted inside ‘()’.