Table 2.
Drivers and barriers for implementation within constructs of NPT derived from two or more stakeholder groups.
| Themes | Stakeholders | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| IC | HCP | HCM | |
| Coherence: in order to promote or inhibit the routine embedding of a practice. | |||
| Perceived health benefits of LM. | D | D | D |
| Unclear cost efficiency for the health care organization. | - | B | B |
| Lacking opportunities for flexibility of the health care system. | B | - | B |
| Cognitive participation: to enroll individuals to engage with the new practice. | |||
| Lacking opportunities in transition of care and responsibilities. | B | B | B |
| Collective action: to enact the new practice. | |||
| Unclear eligibility strategy for clients. | B | B | B |
| Unclear ambassador strategy (for HCP’s). | B | B | B |
| Reflexive monitoring: to reflect on the new practice. | B | B | B |
| Lacking perceived reliability of the technology. | B | B | B |
IC = Informal caregiver, HCP = health care professional, HCM = health care manager, LM = lifestyle monitoring, NPT = normalization process theory, - not mentioned as driver or barrier, D = perceived driver experienced by stakeholder in this study, B = perceived barrier experienced by stakeholder in this study.