Table 2.
Control | LPS | LPS + Meldonium | |
---|---|---|---|
IVSs, mm | 1.1 ± 0.03 * | 1.0 ± 0.03 | 1.1 ± 0.02 * |
IVSd, mm | 0.6 ± 0.02 | 0.5 ± 0.01 | 0.6 ± 0.02 |
LVPWs, mm | 1.1 ± 0.04 * | 0.8 ± 0.03 | 1.0 ± 0.04 # |
LVPWd, mm | 0.6 ± 0.04 | 0.5 ± 0.03 | 0.5 ± 0.02 |
LVIDs, mm | 3.2 ± 0.1 * | 3.6 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.1 * |
LVIDd, mm | 4.6 ± 0.1 | 4.5 ± 0.1 | 4.3 ± 0.1 |
ESV, mL | 0.09 ± 0.01 * | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 * |
EDV, mL | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.01 |
HR, bpm | 453 ± 27 | 501 ± 11 | 477 ± 10 |
Heart rate (HR), left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-systole (LVPWs), left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-diastole (LVPWd), interventricular septal thickness at end-systole (IVSs), interventricular septal thickness at end-diastole (IVSd), left ventricular internal dimension at end-systole (LVIDs), left ventricular internal dimension at end-diastole (LVIDd), end systolic volume (ESV) and end diastolic volume (EDV) of the animals from all three groups. The data are shown as the mean±SEM of 7 to 8 animals. # p < 0.07 vs. the LPS group, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, * p < 0.05 vs. the LPS group, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.