Table 4.
Author (Year) | Study Design | Sample Size | Age (years) | Biomarkers | Results/Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kaygusuz et al. (2004) [44] | Prospective | 30 patients, 30 controls |
38.7 ± 15.3 (Mean) | TNF-α, IFN-γ, TGF-β, CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD19+, CD16+ plus 56+ | CD4+ cell and ratio of CD4+/CD8+ lower and the percentage of the CD8+ and CD16+ plus 56+ cells higher compared with the control group. The levels of TNF-α were lower, whereas IFN-γ and TGF-β1 were higher |
Tekgul et al. (2004) [15] |
Prospective | 17 patients, 20 controls |
7.82 ± 4.41, 12.4 ± 8.4 |
Immunologic parameters (total T cells (CD3+), B cells (CD19+), T helper/inducer cells (CD4+), T cytotoxic (CD8+), and natural killer cells (CD16+ CD56+) | We did not find any prognostic significance of lymphocyte subset analysis in peripheral blood to predict outcome in patients with unsatisfactory recovery |
Yılmaz et al. (2002) [45] |
Prospective | 23 patients, 30 controls |
40.2 ± 15.7, 42.4 ± 8.4 (Mean) |
Immunologic parameters (IL-1β, IL-2r, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) | The cytokine levels of did not correlate with the degree of recovery |